Michael Kitces #FinTech

Working remotely experiment over: Back home in San Diego

Sheryl Rowling answers the question: Is it possible to work remotely for a month?

May 28, 2014 @ 1:52 pm

By Sheryl Rowling

I arrived home from France the other night. It was a long day — literally — since I chased the sun all the way! Although I am very jet lagged, I’ve had time to evaluate the experiment. Was it really possible to work remotely for a month?

(See part one of Sheryl’s story: Can an adviser work remotely for a month?)

Ignoring the fact that it wasn’t quite a month (I cut my trip a little short due to my broken foot), I would say “yes.” After spending just three hours in the office Tuesday, my emails are caught up (since I only had a day’s worth to answer) and I have handled all of the mail and paperwork stacked up on my desk.

For the most part, I had already seen and taken action on any client-related items thanks to my office manager’s scanning and emailing. The rest was primarily professional reading and administrative items. While away, I was able to return phone calls daily, so there were no phone messages to deal with. So, with a half day back at work, I am caught up.

(See part two: Three tech tricks for functioning smoothly overseas)

It’s true that I did not get ahead on my work. I didn’t tackle any major long-term projects, and I didn’t get to any of my non-priority tasks. I’m okay with that; at least I didn’t lose ground.

Would I do it again? My answer is again “yes.” I think May is a good month to go. It’s not overly busy; it’s not the end of the quarter, and it’s not tax time. What would I do differently?

1) I would ensure high quality, high speed internet. The internet service at our rented apartment was hit or miss. At one point, I actually had to resort to my cell phone for an hour long meeting at 99 cents per minute. (That was pretty good for four weeks, right?)

2) I would be more realistic about the time zone difference. It was nice to sightsee during the day and start work at 6 p.m. However, it was impossible to work more than five or six hours, and I was tired. It’s not that I wouldn’t go to Europe again; I would just adjust my expectations.

3) I would tell my clients. A lot of them found out about my journey through this blog. (I had no idea how many of them read this!) Now that they know I really can work on my extended sojourns, I believe it is better to be up front about my location. It might even inspire them!

I have to admit that another benefit to my experiment was having four weeks of not needing new topics for my weekly blogs. I will need to put on my thinking cap for next week!

I hope that my experience will prompt some of you to try your own extended get-away.

Sheryl Rowling is chief executive of Total Rebalance Expert and principal at Rowling & Associates. She considers herself a non-techie user of technology.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Most watched

INTV

Schwab's Jeff Kleintop: Prep for volatility given China trade uncertainties

China could be considered a developed market in five to seven years , according to Jeff Kleintop, chief global investment strategist, Charles Schwab.

INTV

Young advisers envision a radically different business in five years

Fintech and sustainable investing are two factors being watched closely by some of the 2019 class of InvestmentNews' 40 Under 40.

Latest news & opinion

TIAA exits the life insurance business

The move is a big deal for RIAs, experts say, since TIAA was one of only a few insurers to offer fee-only life policies.

Advisers step up efforts to help clients manage student loan debt

As some Democrats campaign to wipe the slate clean, financial planners focus on limiting the amount students borrow.

Funding for Reg BI, other SEC advice reform efforts denied in Waters amendment

House likely to approve measure that effectively kills rule package, but it faces uphill battle in Senate

Wall Street lashes out at Sanders' plan to pay off student debt with a securities trading tax

Financial pros argue that a transaction levy will hurt mom-and-pop investors along with investment houses.

GPB paid B-Ds and reps steep commissions to sell troubled private placements

GPB paid commissions of 9.3%, or $167 million altogether, on the firm's private placements.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print