Missouri bars pension advances for public workers

Show Me State's action follows heightened regulatory scrutiny

Jul 9, 2014 @ 12:01 pm

By Darla Mercado

Missouri's governor Jay Nixon on Tuesday signed a law that made it the first state to bar pension advances — a practice wherein retirees are offered a lump sum in exchange for signing over all or part of their income stream — for public workers.

“This practice is bad for consumers. It preys on a vulnerable population, and it's bad for retirement security in general,” Missouri's Treasurer Clint Zweifel, who championed House Bill 1217, said in an interview.

Indeed, the Government Accountability Office on Monday released a study that found that exploitative business practices abound in the world of pension advance transactions. The GAO identified at least 38 companies — at least 21 of which are related to each other in ways that aren't apparent to consumers — that operate in this space, noting that “some targeted financially vulnerable consumers with poor or bad credit nationwide.”

The GAO received pension advance offers from six out of 19 pension advance companies, and the deals were unfavorable compared to other financial products, including loans and lump-sum options through a pension plan. For instance, the investigation revealed that the effective interest rate on pension advances ranged from 27% to 46% — two to three times higher than the legal usury rates set by states.

At the same time, investors who were snapping up the pension streams were earning attractive yields that were as high as 7% — which is still beating most fixed-income investments that are on the market these days.

Mr. Zweifel called for an outright ban of the pension advance business for public employees after observing that some of these companies were trying to do business in Missouri. Effectively, there was an underworld of pension advance firms that were advertising their services on Craigslist in the state, he said.

“They were operating under the radar in many ways,” Mr. Zweifel said. “[The pension advances] weren't loans, but they weren't a security. State securities regulators couldn't regulate them, and at the same time they're not regulated by the banking laws.”

Though the Show Me State is the first to outright bar these pension advances, Vermont was the first to regulate the practice, enacting a law in April that will treat these advances in a way that's similar to lending.

Last year, federal legislators placed a sharp focus on pension advances following a series of reports that involved retirees selling off portions of future pension income for lump sums. The Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions in May 2013 pushed state attorneys general to turn up information on these practices.

Further, last year the Securities and Exchange Commission warned retirees of the consequences of selling either their pension or a structured settlement to an investor in exchange for a lump sum.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

INTV

Why advisers are pessimistic about the economy

Deputy editor Bob Hordt and senior research analyst Matt Sirinides discuss a recent InvestmentNews survey of advisers, most of whom see a recession ahead before the next presidential election.

Recommended Video

Keys to a successful deal

Latest news & opinion

Advisers throw cold water on FIRE movement

Millennials love it, advisers don't: Turns out, extreme early retirement is a suitable goal for almost nobody.

10 universities with the most billionaire alumni

These 10 American schools have the greatest number of alumni who are billionaires.

Top-performing ETFs of 2018

The markets took a beating last year, but these exchange-traded funds bucked the trend

Morningstar says investors rushed the exits in 2018

Net flows into mutual funds and ETFs were the lowest since the 2008 financial crisis, while money-market funds captured inflows.

Widow awarded $4.2 million by Finra panel for theft by ex-Royal Alliance broker

The former broker, Gary Basralian, earlier pleaded guilty to theft and is facing up to 20 years in prison.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print