Subscribe

Brokers can complain to Finra about exams – anonymously

Brokers like to complain about Finra exams. Now they have a chance to tell the organization exactly what they think — anonymously.

Brokers like to complain about Finra exams. Now they have a chance to tell the organization exactly what they think — anonymously.
This week, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. began sending to each of its 4,125 member firms a questionnaire about the exam process. The survey covers areas such as Finra’s performance, the targeting of exams at particular firms, and the efficiency and timing of exams. It also asks for suggestions for improvement.
The industry-funded broker-dealer regulator is seeking “honest and candid input” by conducting the survey anonymously through a third-party firm, Finra chairman and chief executive Richard Ketchum said earlier this week at the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association meeting in New York.
“This is an effort to try to get that criticism in a safe way,” Mr. Ketchum told reporters on the sidelines of the event.
On a SIFMA panel, he said Finra has enhanced its exam program over the last few years by making it “risk based” to better target potential problem firms. Exams also have become more “data driven,” he said, requiring firms to turn over more information to the regulator but reducing the amount of time Finra examiners spend at firms.
“We are interested as to what burdens we’re imposing and whether we’re looking at the right things,” Mr. Ketchum said of the survey.
The shortcomings of the exam process are well known, said Peter Chepucavage, general counsel at Plexus Consulting Group. He cited “duplicative exams” and “nitpicking.”
“They know what the answers are going to be,” he said. “When you have an exam process that requires a lot of time and a lot of people, you’re straining the system. You better have good results.”
Too often exams focus on administrative and other issues that don’t pose investor harm, said Linda Riefberg, a former Finra chief enforcement counsel.
“A lot of attention at the exam level is paid to inconsequential things,” said Ms. Riefberg, a partner at Cozen O’Connor.
Finra is not going to make the exam feedback public, but it will announce any changes subsequently made to compliance reviews.
“We’re going to take reaction in and try to figure out how to make the exam program more efficient, better and less burdensome,” Mr. Ketchum said.

Related Topics:

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

FPA, CFP Board diverge on DOL investment advice proposal

While the CFP Board supports the proposal, the FPA has expressed concerns about the DOL rule potentially raising compliance costs for members, increasing the cost of advice and reducing access to advice for some.

Braxton encourages RIAs to see investing in diversity as a business strategy

‘If a firm values its human capital, then it will make an investment to make sure that their talent can flourish for the advancement of the bottom line,’ says Lazetta Rainey Braxton, co-CEO of 2050 Wealth Partners.

Bill chips away at SALT block but comes with drawbacks, advisors say

'I’d love to see the [full] SALT deduction come back but not if it means rates go up,' one advisor says.

Former Morgan Stanley broker running for office reviewing $147K award

Deborah Adeimy claimed firm blocked her from running in GOP primary, aide says 'we're unclear how award figure was calculated.'

GOP bill to kill SEC proposal on advisor AI conflicts faces obstacles

It’s more likely the GOP will make a point about their frustrations with the SEC than actually get the bill through the Democratic-controlled Senate.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print