On Retirement

Social Security benefits for remarried widows and widowers

Remarriage at age 60 or later preserves the right to survivor benefits

Sep 8, 2015 @ 2:47 pm

By Mary Beth Franklin

When a widow or widower, or a surviving ex-spouse, waits until age 60 or later to remarry, they preserve the right to collect Social Security benefits on their deceased spouse's earnings record.

If they are entitled to their own Social Security retirement benefit as well, it presents some interesting planning opportunities to maximize lifetime benefits. But matters can get complicated when a new spouse enters the picture.

Heather Piskorz, a retirement income expert and vice president of advanced markets at GamePlan Financial Marketing, asked my advice about a complicated situation where a widow who is collecting her late husband's Social Security survivor benefit recently remarried at age 62.

The newly remarried widow intends to continue collecting survivor benefits on her late husband's Social Security record until age 70, when she will switch to her own retirement benefit — assuming it is larger than her survivor benefit.

A survivor benefit is worth up to 100% of what the deceased worker was collecting or was entitled to collect at the time of death — assuming the surviving spouse is at least full retirement age at the time of collection. Reduced survivor benefits are available as early as age 60, but they are worth just 71.5% of the deceased worker's benefit compared to 100% if collected at age 66.

But survivor benefits are frozen in time. They never increase — other than by annual cost-of-living adjustments — beyond the deceased worker's entitlement.

Retirement benefits, on the other hand, continue grow by 8% per year for every year one postpones collecting them beyond full retirement age up to age 70. So by waiting until age 70 to switch to her own benefits, the widow's own benefit would be worth 132% of her full retirement age amount thanks to four years of delayed retirement credits.

“Her new husband, who is a year older than she, wants to file for half of her Social Security benefit at his full retirement age and then switch to his own benefit at 70,” Ms. Piskorz wrote. She said she suspected this strategy wouldn't work, but wanted to confirm her suspicions.

“Your gut instinct is correct,” I replied.

I explained that the widow is receiving survivor benefits on her late husband's earnings record. She is not collecting her own retirement benefit. Therefore, there is no spousal benefit for her new husband to collect at this time. He cannot collect a spousal benefit until she either files for her own benefit or files and suspends at 66 to trigger a spousal benefit for him. But if she took either of those actions, she would forfeit her survivor benefit.

Although I do not know the precise dollar amounts involved, I suspect she is better off collecting her survivor benefit now and allowing her own retirement benefit to grow to the maximum amount at age 70.

Looking at the couple's Social Security claiming decisions from a household income perspective, it may be better for the new husband to claim his benefit at 66. If his new wife's retirement benefit would be bigger than his when she begins collecting it at 70, her larger benefit would become the survivor benefit for whichever one of them survives.

Ms. Piskorz also posed a related question.

“Let's say the survivor benefit that the remarried widow is receiving will always be higher than any benefit she receives under her own work record, so she never switches from the widow benefit to her own retirement benefit,” she hypothesized. “Then assume she dies at 71.

“Would her new husband be entitled to her age 70 benefit (assuming it is higher than his) or her full retirement age benefit amount?”

“He would be eligible for her age 70 benefit amount, assuming it was larger than his own benefit,” I replied. “However, if her retirement benefit were not bigger than his, he would continue receiving his own benefit. There would be no survivor benefit for him to collect.”

Frank Owen of FR Owen & Associates in Charlotte, N.C., posed similar questions about one of his clients, a widow who remarried after age 60 and is still collecting survivor benefits of $1,150 per month on her first husband's Social Security record. She is now 74.

Her current husband, 73, began drawing his Social Security benefit when he was 68. He receives about $2,500 per month.

“If she claimed benefits under her current spouse's earning record, would her Social Security benefits increase?” Mr. Owen asked. “What would happen if her current spouse dies?”

Because her current husband claimed benefits about five years ago when he turned 68, his current benefit includes about two years' worth of delayed retirement credits plus several years of cost-of-living adjustments. I suspect his full retirement age amount was about $2,200 per month. That means the maximum spousal benefit would be half of that amount — $1,100 per month — which is less than his wife is receiving from her late husband's survivor benefit.

But if the current husband dies first, the newly widowed wife would step up to his larger benefit — $2,500 per month — as her new survivor benefit.

(Questions about Social Security? Find the answers in my ebook.)

Mary Beth Franklin is a certified financial planner.


What do you think?

View comments

Upcoming event

Nov 13


Top Advisory Firm Summit

Formerly known as the Best Practices Workshop, this new one-day conference will also include content from the Best Places to Work event!The Top Advisory Firm Summit will provide CEOs, COOs, CTOs, CMOs, and Managing Partners from the... Learn more

Most watched


Young advisers envision a radically different business in five years

Fintech and sustainable investing are two factors being watched closely by some of the 2019 class of InvestmentNews' 40 Under 40.


Young professionals see lots of opportunity to reinvent the advice experience

Members of the 2019 InvestmentNews class of 40 Under 40 have strategies to overcome the challenges of being young in a mature industry.

Latest news & opinion

New Jersey fiduciary rule: Pressure leads to public hearing, comment deadline extension

Industry push results in chance to air grievances on July 17 and another month to present objections.

InvestmentNews' 2019 class of 40 Under 40

Our 40 Under 40 project, now in its sixth year, highlights young talent in the financial advice industry. These individuals illustrate the tremendous potential of those coming up in the profession. These stories will surprise, entertain, educate and inspire.

Galvin to propose fiduciary rule for Massachusetts brokers

The secretary of the commonwealth is proposing a fiduciary standard in response to an SEC investment-advice rule he views as too weak.

Summer reading recommendations from financial advisers

Here are some books that will keep you informed and entertained during summer's downtime

4 strategies for Roth conversions

There's never been a better time to do a Roth conversion, and here are several ways to go about it.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print