Fiduciary Corner

12 predictions about what the Labor Department's fiduciary rule will look like when implemented

It will be tweaked, but will largely remain intact as it works its way through the regulatory mill

Nov 5, 2015 @ 10:58 am

By Blaine F. Aikin

Opponents of the Department of Labor's controversial conflict of interest rule continue to turn up the political heat. On Oct. 27, the House passed legislation sponsored by Rep. Ann Wagner, R-Mo., that would prohibit the DOL from finalizing the rule until the Securities and Exchange Commission acts to extend fiduciary status to those who provide retail advice.

Advisers should not be distracted by all of the noise. Despite the daily drumbeat of industry-inspired opposition, a review of the political and regulatory landscape leads to the conclusion that the DOL fiduciary rule will survive largely intact.

On the political side, opponents can try to force delay through legislative action like the Wagner bill, or they could seek to deny the DOL funding to implement the rule once it is enacted. Both of these strategies look like long shots. There remains a lack of enthusiasm on the Senate side for legislation of this sort. Moreover, President Obama drew a line in the sand with his forceful Feb. 23 announcement supporting the rule.

VETO THREAT

Senate Republicans on their own are unlikely to achieve the 60-vote majority needed to overcome filibusters or other procedural delays. And even if they did, President Obama has threatened a veto. The bill might succeed if it is attached to must-pass legislation, but the Senate simply does not have a veto-proof majority to pass it as a stand-alone.

Legislative riders attached to appropriation bills already passed by the House that would prohibit the department from using any funding to finalize the proposal would face the same challenge.

On the regulatory front, the DOL is in a strong position to defend the rule. It has offered ample opportunities for comment, is certain to incorporate some changes to the rule that have been suggested by industry, and has been extremely careful to avoid administrative mistakes in the rule-making process that could give opponents the opportunity for a successful legal challenge.

While prognostication can be a risky business, after weighing the political landscape and considering hundreds of pages of comment letters and hearing transcripts, I will go out on a limb and offer the following 12 predictions about the rule that will come to pass:

1. A largely intact rule will be adopted in the first quarter of 2016.

2. The final rule will include all proposed carve-outs and exemptions, as well as fiduciary coverage for individual retirement accounts and rollover advice.

3. Industry groups will challenge the rule in court, but the suit will fail to prove the DOL acted contrary to law.

4. The final rule will become effective no later than Jan. 1, 2017, possibly with phase-ins after that date.

5. Some requirements in the best-interest contract exemption will be eased or clarified, including the ability to discuss investment recommendations with a client before signing the contract.

6. The reporting of compensation based on future investment performance in the contract exemption will be eliminated.

7. The exemption will be broadened to allow advisers with compensation conflicts to serve small defined-contribution plans if they fulfill the requirements of the exemption.

CARVE-OUT FOR EDUCATION

8. The carve-out for investor education will be loosened to allow reference to specific products so long as the education does not tacitly or explicitly lead to a product recommendation.

9. Fiduciary advisers who provide advice to a plan and/or the plan's participants on a level-fee basis will also be able to offer rollover advice to the participants without having to rely on the exemption.

10. There will be significant disruption to the broker-dealer business model as firms seek to avoid the use of the exemption.

(Related read: Expect tumult for B-Ds if DOL fiduciary comes to pass)

11. The DOL will abandon the idea of a so-called “low-cost, high-quality” prohibited-transaction exemption.

12. The cost and quality of personalized advice will rise; however, the higher cost of professional advice will be more than offset by product cost decreases and process improvements.

Of course, there are many other provisions in this complex rulemaking that are not addressed here. One of the biggest remaining questions is the transition plan for existing 401(k) or IRA transactions. While department officials have acknowledged that some grandfathering procedure will be required, it has offered no hint of what that might involve.

Blaine F. Aikin is president and chief executive of fi360 Inc.

0
Comments

What are your predictions for the Labor Department's fiduciary rule?

View comments

Recommended for you

Upcoming Event

May 14

Conference

Retirement Income Summit

Join InvestmentNews at the 13th annual Retirement Income Summit—the industry’s premier retirement planning conference.Clients and investors continue to search for retirement income solutions and personalized investing advice. This... Learn more

Featured video

Events

The power of commodities in 2019

Historically commodities have outperformed stocks at the end of expansions and in early recessions. So why haven't commodities rebounded? John Love of USCF explains.

Latest news & opinion

Look for more changes at Cetera Financial Group

CEO Robert Moore's resignation signals further adjustments at the IBD network.

10 top scams targeting seniors

Phone calls to a Senate committee hotline show trends in frauds perpetrated against seniors.

Robert Moore, Cetera CEO, stepping down for health reasons

Chairman Ben Brigeman will serve as interim chief executive while a search for a permanent CEO is conducted.

The AMT is no longer a problem for many clients

With income thresholds higher and a lower SALT deduction after tax reform, the AMT will realistically only apply to wealthy Americans with out-of-the-ordinary tax events.

Cetera, other broker-dealers refuse to sign Ohio National contracts

Advisers wonder what the lack of a formal brokerage agreement means from a regulatory standpoint.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print