Ask the Ethicist

Couple's divorce poses conflict for their adviser

This month's question comes from an adviser whose clients decided to divorce

Feb 5, 2016 @ 10:00 am

By Dan Candura

Q: I got a call from a long-time client last week asking to schedule an appointment without her husband. I try to meet with married couples together, so I asked why she wanted to meet alone. She never has before. She told me that after 25 years of marriage they were getting a divorce because she found out that her husband was unfaithful to her. And, it was not the first time. She wants me to provide financial advice on the best way to split their assets, which assets she should request and which of her assets she should protect. I always provide services to both of them as a couple. I want to help, but I am feeling very awkward and uncomfortable in the middle of this domestic dispute.

A: That uncomfortable feeling is caused by the enormous conflict of interest pressing down on your shoulders. And it was placed there — perhaps unknowingly, perhaps not — by your client who is asking you to choose sides. You would probably feel just as uncomfortable if the wayward spouse shared his indiscretions with you before his wife found out. I surely hope he did not.

Your role as the financial adviser to this couple must be to treat them equally and fairly. If you are a CFP professional providing financial planning or a NAPFA member providing services, you must act as a fiduciary. That means you must act in the best interest of both clients, and you cannot favor one client over the other. Since divorce is a zero-sum game, advice that helps one party will almost always hurt the other. Even in amicable divorces, advisers may find themselves required to make Solomon-like decisions. So what should you do?

The first thing to do is to terminate any financial planning arrangements that you are providing to the couple — and stop charging any fees related to the financial planning services. Your agreement was with the couple to help them accomplish joint goals and objectives using their combined income and assets. Since you now know that they no longer hold those same goals, you must end that relationship until after the divorce is finalized. You cannot deliver what both of your clients need right now: unbiased, objective and unconflicted advice from someone with knowledge and experience working with divorcing couples. The Association of Divorce Financial Planners (ADFP) is a good place to start looking for someone who meets that criteria. Both parties need their own adviser, and it might be best for their attorneys to hire that adviser as a consultant to the proceedings. The financial impact is potentially too great to do less.

After the divorce, you may choose to work with either spouse but you should avoid trying to work with both since there will likely be additional conflicts of interest down the road. Your job is to provide the best advice possible to your client and that could be made more difficult with the knowledge you may have of the financial affairs of an ex. Nothing lasts forever, and trying to hold onto splintered relationships may be as foolish for you as it would be for your clients.

Dan Candura is founder of the education and consulting firm, Candura Group. Write to him to submit a question. All submissions will be treated confidentially.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Most watched

INTV

Schwab's Jeff Kleintop: Prep for volatility given China trade uncertainties

China could be considered a developed market in five to seven years , according to Jeff Kleintop, chief global investment strategist, Charles Schwab.

INTV

Young advisers envision a radically different business in five years

Fintech and sustainable investing are two factors being watched closely by some of the 2019 class of InvestmentNews' 40 Under 40.

Latest news & opinion

Funding for Reg BI, other SEC advice reform efforts denied in Waters amendment

House likely to approve measure that effectively kills rule package, but it faces uphill battle in Senate

Wall Street lashes out at Sanders' plan to pay off student debt with a securities trading tax

Financial pros argue that a transaction levy will hurt mom-and-pop investors along with investment houses.

GPB paid B-Ds and reps steep commissions to sell troubled private placements

GPB paid commissions of 9.3%, or $167 million altogether, on the firm's private placements.

Give us a break, active managers say

Seven portfolio managers share their outlooks for the rest of the year, generally agreeing that it's been hard for active managers to stand out.

GPB Capital reports decline in value of two biggest funds

One has dropped by 25.4% and the other by 39%, according to the company.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print