The Washington INsider

This insurance group likely to be first to file DOL fiduciary lawsuit

The ACLI is champing at the bit to get legal action started, but it likely wants to know which other groups will be running before it starts its own race

May 10, 2016 @ 5:14 pm

By Mark Schoeff Jr.

Like horses running in the upcoming Preakness, financial industry trade associations may be off to the races on lawsuits against the recently released Labor Department investment advice rule.

While the others prance around, it looks as if the American Council of Life Insurers has entered the gate.

“The ACLI board of directors has approved exploring the details of a legal challenge to the Department of Labor's fiduciary regulation,” ACLI spokesman Jack Dolan said in a statement responding to an InvestmentNews inquiry. “ACLI will make strategic decisions based on further direction given by our member companies.”

This statement reads like the first concrete indication from a financial industry lobbying group that a lawsuit is imminent. It's not likely ACLI staff will return to the board and say, “About that suit – never mind.”

The clock is ticking. The effective date of the regulation is June 7. It's the one to watch, if the point of legal action is to place an injunction against the rule.

Lawsuits could be filed later than June 7, but then they would be trying to stop a regulation that has already survived a congressional challenge and is more securely in place.

That effective date is different from the applicability date of April 2017, when financial advisers must start acting in the best interests of their clients in 401(k), individual retirement accounts and other qualified accounts. The full implementation date is January 2018.

(More: DOL official: Agency will consider changes to fiduciary rule if problems arise)

The ACLI is champing at the bit to get legal action started, but it likely wants to know which other groups will be running before it starts its own race to beat the rule.

Insurance groups have raised concerns about the regulation's impact on variable and fixed indexed annuities. Both would fall under the so-called best interest contract exemption, a legally binding agreement that allows advisers to charge commissions as long as they act in the client's best interests.

Opponents assert that the rule is complex and costly and would make giving and receiving advice significantly more expensive. Proponents say the rule is necessary to prevent brokers from selling high-fee investment products that erode retirement savings.

Labor Secretary Thomas Perez has expressed confidence that the rule will survive lawsuits.

We should soon be on the way to knowing whether he's right.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

Events

The capacity conundrum: Why its hampering your growth

How do you get good next gen talent to your firm to help open up more capacity? Live Oak's Mike McGinley has the answer.

Latest news & opinion

Q&A with Abigail Johnson and Kathleen Murphy of Fidelity Investments

The Fidelity CEO, along with the president of personal investing, discuss record earnings, allegations of sexual misconduct and the challenges facing a changing industry.

Fight for New Jersey fiduciary rule yields doomsday rhetoric from both sides

Stakeholders warned of a 'crisis' and 'decimation of our financial system' at a public meeting held by the New Jersey Bureau of Securities.

The Women’s Issue

News, video and expert opinion about women in financial advice

Meet the 2018 Women to Watch

These female financial advisers and other industry leaders are recognized for their successes and support of other women in the financial advice business.

Some good news about female recruitment in financial advice

Each of four core advisory positions tracked in InvestmentNews' benchmarking study has seen an uptick in women entrants.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print