Merrill Lynch owes stiffed brokers $800,000 in damages after termination dispute, Finra says

Arbitration panel pointed to customer letters as evidence the brokers had done nothing wrong

Oct 10, 2016 @ 12:47 pm

By Christine Idzelis

Bank of America Merrill Lynch has to pay $800,000 in compensatory damages to two brokers who claimed the firm stiffed them in compensation after they were fired without cause, according to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc.

Merrill Lynch alleged that Roman Reed and Victor Barrionuevo owed the firm money under a promissory note agreement they signed when they were hired in April 2009, according to Finra arbitration document dated Oct. 7. The brokerage firm claimed about $1.6 million in damages after their employment was terminated “for cause” in 2015, citing the outstanding balance of the promissory notes and unjust enrichment.

Merrill had accused Mr. Reed and Mr. Barrionuevo of improperly handling a customer complaint, violating the firm's rules and industry standards by not immediately informing their employer of the client's dissatisfaction. The brokers filed a counterclaim of fraud, defamation and tortious interference with an existing contract, saying there was no cause for termination and that Merrill had financial incentive to fire them.

Disputes over the promissory notes often end up in Finra arbitration cases as brokers keep battling to hold onto related cash they receive when joining a firm and for reaching certain performance targets. The decision in favor of the former Merrill brokers stands out because financial advisers typically lose to their former employers.

“The panel does not find credible Merrill Lynch's explanation for the brokers' termination,” according to the arbitration award document. “The evidence bears out that the brokers were fired because Merrill Lynch wanted to retain the customer's lucrative business without having to honor the transitional compensation contract with the brokers.”

While the brokerage firm said it settled with the customer due to feared legal action, the Finra panel saw little litigation risk due to two letters it had in hand from the customer indicating there was no wrongdoing.

“The letters from the customer state explicitly that the brokers had done nothing wrong with the handling of his complaints and that no negative action against the brokers was called for,” according to the Finra arbitration document. ”The customer admitted that he was surprised that Merrill Lynch offered him a settlement, much less a settlement that exceeded the amount he demanded.”

The settlement only reinforced the notion that retaining the customer's business was Merrill Lynch's primary concern, according to the Finra panel, which recommended their termination record be expunged of the alleged wrongdoing.

Merrill is also responsible for the brokers' attorneys' fees, which totaled $215,000, bringing the firm's tab to slightly more than $1 million, the document shows.

Susan Atran, a spokesperson for Merrill Lynch, didn't immediately return a phone call seeking comment.


What do you think?

View comments

Most watched


Young advisers envision a radically different business in five years

Fintech and sustainable investing are two factors being watched closely by some of the 2019 class of InvestmentNews' 40 Under 40.


Schwab's Jeff Kleintop: Prep for volatility given China trade uncertainties

China could be considered a developed market in five to seven years , according to Jeff Kleintop, chief global investment strategist, Charles Schwab.

Latest news & opinion

Funding for Reg BI, other SEC advice reform efforts denied in Waters amendment

House likely to approve measure that effectively kills rule package, but it faces uphill battle in Senate

Wall Street lashes out at Sanders' plan to pay off student debt with a securities trading tax

Financial pros argue that a transaction levy will hurt mom-and-pop investors along with investment houses.

GPB paid B-Ds and reps steep commissions to sell troubled private placements

GPB paid commissions of 9.3%, or $167 million altogether, on the firm's private placements.

Give us a break, active managers say

Seven portfolio managers share their outlooks for the rest of the year, generally agreeing that it's been hard for active managers to stand out.

GPB Capital reports decline in value of two biggest funds

One has dropped by 25.4% and the other by 39%, according to the company.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print