Tax Planning

Help clients manage tax payments during the year

Tax projections at this time of year will tell individuals their total tax liability for 2016, but that doesn't necessarily mean it all has to be paid before the end of the year

Oct 21, 2016 @ 3:16 pm

By Tim Steffen

This time of year, many taxpayers are reviewing their income and deductions to see if there is anything that can be done to reduce their federal tax bill for 2016. After making those last few charitable donations, maximizing retirement plan contributions and netting capital gains and losses, they find they've done all they can for the year, and now it's time to pay the piper.

Or is it?

Tax projections at this time of year will tell individuals their total tax liability for 2016, but that doesn't necessarily mean it all has to be paid before the end of the year. The best advice to give your clients this time of year: Pay as little as you have to now to avoid a penalty, but then wait to pay the balance when you file your tax return.

REQUIRED ANNUAL PAYMENT

Taxpayers have two options for determining their required annual payment, the amount of tax that must be paid before the end of the calendar year in order to avoid a penalty — either 90% of their actual liability for the current year or 100% of the liability for the prior year. If a taxpayer's prior year adjusted gross income was more than $150,000, the 100% becomes 110%, although the 90% option remains available. As long as the taxpayer's payments exceed one of those two targets, it doesn't matter how much is owed when the tax return is filed — there won't be an underpayment penalty.

Taxpayers whose income is nearly all subject to withholding, such as wages or commissions, usually exceed the 90% of current year threshold. Where it becomes harder to meet that target is when they have significant income that is not withheld on, including income from self-employment, rental properties or pass-through entities such as S Corps or trusts. This also includes investment income, such as interest, dividends and capital gains.

So what about the client whose wages are withheld on, but who also realizes a large capital gain during the year? Do they need to pay the tax on that gain before year-end? It depends on the size of the gain.

If the gain is large enough that their withholding no longer exceeds 90% of their current year liability, then perhaps. However, that employee still has the 100% of prior year liability target (or 110%, if applicable). As long as their withholding exceeds that target, the tax on the gain can be deferred until the tax return is filed.

If the employee's withholding doesn't reach either level, then they'll need to either increase the withholding on their income for the rest of the year, or make a separate estimated payment to the IRS.

PENALTY CALCULATION

While an estimated payment can be used to get a taxpayer to the required payment amount, it can't be used to minimize withholding during the year and then catch up to the target at year-end. That's because the required annual payment is determined on a quarterly basis. If the payments at the end of each quarter are less than the required payment (either of the two targets, whichever is less), the taxpayer has underpaid and a penalty is assessed. The annual penalty rate was 3% of the underpaid amount for the first quarter of 2016, and then 4% for the rest of this year, and is calculated on IRS Form 2210.

The default penalty calculation assumes that income is earned evenly throughout the year, meaning tax payments should also be made evenly. In cases where income spikes late in the year, perhaps due to a capital gain, clients can use a technique called annualized income. This technique allows a taxpayer to make payments based on their income as it's earned, rather than evenly. As a result, a taxpayer can base their payments on current year income for the first three quarters of the year. If a large gain occurs in the fourth quarter, they can make an extra payment to meet the 90% threshold or switch to the prior year liability option if that's lower.

While this discussion applies to federal tax, most states follow similar rules. In both cases, you should work with your clients to find the right balance between avoiding penalties and maintaining access to their money as long as possible.

Tim Steffen is director of financial planning for Robert W. Baird & Co. Follow him on Twitter @TimSteffenCPA.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Upcoming event

Nov 20

Conference

Future of Financial Advice

An innovative conference dedicated to improving the client experience by enhancing digital technology, mainstreaming healthcare and optimizing wealth management strategies.The Future of Financial Advice will provide a forum for... Learn more

Most watched

INTV

Young professionals see lots of opportunity to reinvent the advice experience

Members of the 2019 InvestmentNews class of 40 Under 40 have strategies to overcome the challenges of being young in a mature industry.

INTV

Young advisers envision a radically different business in five years

Fintech and sustainable investing are two factors being watched closely by some of the 2019 class of InvestmentNews' 40 Under 40.

Latest news & opinion

Vermont establishes restitution fund for victims of investment fraud

Portion of settlements with financial perpetrators would supply the pool.

10 IBDs with the most variable annuity revenue

Although the popularity of VAs has declined in recent years, some independent broker-dealers still do a good business in them.

Target-date fund design may be wrong for retirees

Researchers suggest the funds don't adequately hedge against sequence-of-returns risk in retirement.

InvestmentNews' 2019 class of 40 Under 40

Our 40 Under 40 project, now in its sixth year, highlights young talent in the financial advice industry. These individuals illustrate the tremendous potential of those coming up in the profession. These stories will surprise, entertain, educate and inspire.

New Jersey fiduciary rule: Pressure leads to public hearing, comment deadline extension

Industry push results in chance to air grievances on July 17 and another month to present objections.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print