Proceed or stand down: Should advisers continue preparing for the DOL fiduciary rule post Trump?

Many brokers and other financial firms have already changed compensation and other policies to align with the regulation

Nov 11, 2016 @ 1:21 pm

By Mark Schoeff Jr.

Advisory firms on their way to complying with a Labor Department investment advice regulation are debating how many resources they should continue to allocate to a rule whose fate is now uncertain under President-elect Donald Trump.

While many experts and advisers say firms should continue on that path toward compliance, others are in a “wait-and-see” mode.

Mr. Trump's upset win unleashed a torrent of speculation about the viability of the rule, which requires advisers to retirement accounts to act in the best interests of their clients.

The measure has drawn strong criticism from the financial industry, which asserts that it is too complex and costly. The election of a president who may be sympathetic to their argument gives opponents hope that it will be delayed or scrapped.

But the final measure was released in April, became effective in June and has an initial implementation deadline of next April.

Advisory firms have to forge ahead with compliance because the calendar doesn't give them the luxury of waiting to see what happens next, according to Denise Valentine, a senior analyst at Aite Group.

“You have to keep going because there was already too little time to get done what you need to do by the deadline,” Ms. Valentine said. “You would be in a deplorable state by April [if you stop]. It's just too complex.”

A financial technology firm that is helping its clients meet the requirements of the rule encourages them to maintain momentum.

“We're of the mindset to stay the course,” said Angela Pecoraro, chief operating officer at Advicent, a financial planning software provider. “The firms we do business with have invested a lot of time, money and resources into preparing for different compliance deadlines.”

Not everyone is taking the full-steam-ahead approach. Brian Hamburger, president of MarketCounsel, a compliance consulting firm, asserts that Mr. Trump's election threatens the survival of the rule.

“There's no prize for being the first to comply,” Mr. Hamburger said. “What we thought to be true 24 hours ago has all changed. Unless they have a special case, I would not sink resources into compliance until the smoke begins to clear and we have greater clarity as to what we can reasonably expect.”

But many brokers and other financial firms have already changed compensation and other policies to align with the rule.

“It's going to be like turning the Titanic around in the Panama Canal,” said John Nowicki, president of LCM Capital Management. “There's no way of going back.”

The Financial Services Institute, which represents independent broker-dealers who are likely to be the most affected by the rule, is telling its members to proceed with implementation.

“The April 10 date is set until a court, Congress or a new administration changes it,” said Dale Brown, FSI president and chief executive. “Everyone needs to stay focused on getting ready for that until it's clear it's going to change.”

In fact, changing course might mean that a lot of money is wasted.

“It would be more costly for them to go back to square one and start all over,” said Brian Menickella, managing partner of the Beacon Group of Companies.

Potential disruption to a regulation by a presidential transition is nothing new, Ms. Pecoraro said.

“We have seen these things happen before,” she said. “Firms just need to be agile in their thinking and be prepared to make small adjustments in their plans should a change be made by the new administration.”

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Upcoming Event

Sep 10

Conference

Denver Women Adviser Summit

The InvestmentNews Women Adviser Summit, a one-day workshop now held in six cities due to popular demand, is uniquely designed for the sophisticated female adviser who wants to take her personal and professional self to the next level.... Learn more

Featured video

INTV

Why advisers are pessimistic about the economy

Deputy editor Bob Hordt and senior research analyst Matt Sirinides discuss a recent InvestmentNews survey of advisers, most of whom see a recession ahead before the next presidential election.

Latest news & opinion

John Bogle, Vanguard founder, dies at 89

The pioneer of low-cost, passive investments died of cancer.

10 biggest breakaways of Q4

Echelon Partners lists the 10 biggest adviser moves out of wirehouses during last year's final quarter.

6 biggest RIA acquisitions of 2018

As M&A involving registered investment advisers hit another record last year, these six deals topped the list

Anatomy of an annuity buyout offer

Readers are invited to comment on whether the columnist should keep or ditch her Ohio National VA contract

Factions emerge in OneFPA overhaul

Critics fear the FPA is trying to take money and power from local chapters, which officials and proponents call overblown.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print