Other Voices

Advisers should be rewarded for their expertise, not sales skills

It's time for a revised compensation model that directly reflects the delivery of an advice-centric client experience

Jan 30, 2017 @ 12:01 am

By Robert Moore and Adam Antoniades

We had a conversation recently with a financial adviser who recounted how he'd spent several hours with a client who had just inherited significant funds from a close relative. The client was wrestling with how to adjust to this steep change in his personal wealth, while deciding how to reengineer his overall financial plan under these new circumstances.

The adviser spent a considerable amount of time delving into the details of his client's changed situation, including modifications in his family's needs, new emotional priorities and significant questions his inheritance raised about his own estate planning.


When we asked the adviser how he had been compensated, he gave a puzzled look and responded, “I recommended certain insurance policies, I made sure he rebalanced parts of his portfolio to fit his new situation and I encouraged him to increase certain ongoing monthly investments in other vehicles. I was paid for some of the insurance transactions, and I was compensated on a percentage basis for the new fee-based advisory assets.”

It's noteworthy that nowhere in his response did the adviser mention compensation for the real drivers of value he offered for his client: his expertise, his experience, his time and his ability to understand the client's life goals and integrate them into a financial plan.

(More: 10 developments to watch in the IBD industry in 2017)

Therein lies a significant problem. It's time to reimagine the fundamentals of financial adviser compensation so advisers can be rewarded for their expertise and the value they bring to their clients' life goals.

One frequent comparison we hear in the financial advice world is between advisers and doctors. Both diagnose complex issues regarding health — whether physical or financial — and draw on extensive reserves of expertise and personal experience to recommend a course of action.

Very few people question a doctor's basic value proposition, while financial advisers are repeatedly asked to define and demonstrate their own. One core reason for this disparity is the difference in compensation models: Doctors are generally compensated for their time and expertise, while advisers are rewarded according to a model that, in many ways, was built to emphasize sales skills.

(Related read: Adviser compensation, rollovers most complex factors under DOL fiduciary rule)

It is imperative that advisers be rewarded for the time they spend addressing clients' needs, with distinctions made for the following:

1. Comprehensive financial planning. Developing a true financial plan for a client — as opposed to offering basic recommendations on portfolio allocation or particular investment vehicles — is a time-consuming and rigorous process. It requires a tremendous amount of due diligence and expertise to translate the findings into a road map that can get clients where they need to go.

2. Understanding clients' needs. The work involved in staying current on clients' needs can be substantial. For many advisers, it involves engaged discussions with the client and a significant investment of time to keep all the details straight. Just as doctors are compensated for time spent on routine checkups, advisers should be rewarded for the ongoing time commitment it takes to stay up to speed on their clients' situations.

3. Bridging the gap for the younger generation. Bringing younger members of a client's family up to speed on their parents' financial plans is rarely as simple as inviting them to a client meeting. In many cases, a young person's interaction with their parents' financial adviser may be their first exposure to basic financial concepts. These situations often require substantial coaching on the adviser's part.

It's time for a revised financial adviser compensation model that directly rewards the delivery of an advice-centric client experience.

The firms advisers are affiliated with should serve as the primary agents of change in this regard by investing in the technologies, wealth-management platforms and other resources that create a true ecosystem of relationships among firms, advisers and retail investors, characterized by greater levels of transparency and an alignment of interests between each of these key parties.

Robert Moore is CEO and Adam Antoniades is president of Cetera Financial Group.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Does your pay stack up?

The Adviser Research Dashboard

Based on data collected through InvestmentNews' annual adviser research studies, this interactive, customizable tool allows you to view detailed data on compensation, staffing and financial performance practices from across the industry.

Learn more »

Upcoming Event

Jul 09


Boston Women Adviser Summit

The InvestmentNews Women Adviser Summit, a one-day workshop now held in six cities due to popular demand, is uniquely designed for the sophisticated female adviser who wants to take her personal and professional self to the next level.... Learn more

Featured video


Female leaders highlighted as future of financial advice

InvestmentNews recognized 20 Women to Watch for their efforts to advance the financial advice industry.

Latest news & opinion

Choosing between a retroactive lump sum and a bigger monthly Social Security benefit

Some retirees can receive up to six months of back benefits.

Blucora to buy another broker-dealer with tax-focused advisers

Blucora is paying $180 million in stock for 1st Global, with 850 advisers.

Finra panel dismisses $100 million case involving drop in Merrill Lynch stock

Former brokers bringing charges related to stock losses during financial crisis have had 15 cases proceed, four stopped so far.

Principal-Wells Fargo retirement deal would be among largest ever

Acquisition would be in line with trend of record keepers seeking to gain scale to combat fee reduction.

Finra panel dismisses $100 million case involving drop in Merrill Lynch stock

Former brokers bringing charges related to stock losses during financial crisis have had 15 cases proceed, 4 stopped so far.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print