Dallas judge in DOL fiduciary rule suit deals yet another blow to indexed annuities

The judge affirmed that inclusion of indexed annuities in the BICE was reasonable.

Feb 10, 2017 @ 1:34 pm

By Greg Iacurci

The federal judge who this week dealt plaintiffs fighting the Department of Labor's fiduciary rule a stinging defeat also dealt a blow to indexed annuities, a product that has taken quite a beating since the DOL issued its final rule last spring.

The treatment of indexed annuities under the DOL's fiduciary rule was one of the stand-out stories for insurance industry observers when the agency issued its final rule.

In a shocking twist, indexed annuities were, along with variable annuities, ultimately included in the best-interest contract exemption, seen by many as being the most onerous provision in the rule.

Opponents challenged the decision, calling it and other parts of the rule “arbitrary and capricious."

But the judge in the Dallas suit, Barbara M.G. Lynn, supported the DOL's contention that fixed-indexed annuity products are worthy of inclusion in the BICE rather a less-stringent exemption known as Prohibited Transaction Exemption 84-24, which also covers fixed-rate annuities.

“Contrary to Plaintiffs' argument, the DOL drew a reasonable distinction between FIAs and fixed rate annuities and justified moving FIAs from PTE 84-24 to BICE,” according to the judge.

She also supported the DOL's notion that “variable annuities and FIAs share common complexity, high commissions, and resulting conflicts of interest.”

While the judge says the DOL acknowledged similarities between indexed and fixed rate annuities, it found the differences between them “sufficient to justify different treatment,” and said the DOL's notice and comment period prior to switching indexed annuities into BICE was “adequate.”

“Because the DOL's determinations are supported by substantial evidence in the administrative record, the Court should defer to the DOL's judgment,” the court said.

The DOL, in its initial 2015 rule proposal, made a distinction between variable and indexed annuities, placing the variable variety in the BICE and indexed annuities in PTE 84-24, which, among other differences, doesn't expose firms to class-action litigation like BICE does.

The DOL's reasoning for the distinction was because variable annuities are securities products, whereas indexed annuities aren't. But the DOL changed its calculus in the final rule, hinging its decision to lump both into the BICE on the complexity of the products.

Rule opponents seized on this switcheroo as an opening for attack.

Aside from a higher level of risk the BICE places on product recommendations by brokers and agents, inclusion in the BICE has sown doubt as to how distribution of the products through independent insurance agents, which account for the majority of product sales, could continue once the rule is implemented.

Some such as Knut Rostad, president of the Institute for the Fiduciary Standard, believe the Dallas court was right to uphold the Labor Department's argument concerning indexed annuities.

“I think the court's reasoning and analysis was pretty on target,” according to Mr. Rostad. “Should they have been there in the first place? Yes,” he added, referring to their inclusion in the BICE.

Some observers believe, however, the court and DOL erred in their judgment about indexed annuities deserving similar treatment to variable annuities.

“Ultimately, the judge must not know that much about fixed rate annuities. Because an indexed annuity is more like a fixed rate annuity than a variable annuity,” said Sheryl Moore, president and CEO of Moore Market Intelligence, a market research firm.

For example, unlike with a variable annuity, but similar to a fixed rate annuity, an indexed annuity (without an income rider) doesn't carry risk of loss of principal. Further, like fixed rate annuities, product terms such as minimum and maximum cap levels can change on an annual basis subject to approval by insurance regulators.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Upcoming Event

Oct 23

Conference

Women Adviser Summit - San Francisco

The InvestmentNews Women Adviser Summit, a one-day workshop now held in four cities due to popular demand, is uniquely designed for the sophisticated female adviser who wants to take her personal and professional self to the next level.... Learn more

Featured video

Events

InvestmentNews celebrates diversity & inclusion in the financial advice business

Highlights of the Excellence in D&I Awards, showcasing the achievements of 26 individuals and firms that are moving the needle when it comes to diversity and inclusion.

Latest news & opinion

Don't be fooled by the numbers — the industry is in a dangerously vulnerable state

Last year's stock market gains helped advisers turn in solid growth in assets and revenue, but that growth could disappear in the next market downturn.

Divided we stand: How financial advisers view President Trump

InvestmentNews poll finds 49.2% approve of his performance, while 46.7% disapprove. How has that changed over the course of his presidency?

10 states with the most college student debt

Residents of these states have the most student debt when you consider their job opportunities.

Ex-Wells Fargo brokers sue for damages, claiming they lost business in wake of scandals

In a Finra arbitration complaint, two brokers allege that Wells Fargo's problems damaged their business.

Invesco to buy OppenheimerFunds

Deal brings Invesco another $246 billion in assets, as well as high-fee actively managed funds.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print