DOL fiduciary rule: Transfers of IRAs in the new fiduciary world

Little has been said about prudent recommendations to transfer an IRA from another firm to the adviser's firm

Jul 18, 2017 @ 4:28 pm

By Fred Reish

Advisers to plans, participants and individual retirement accounts are now fiduciaries under the Department of Labor's new regulation and prohibited transaction exemptions. As a general statement, any investment recommendation will be fiduciary advice. And, the definition of "investment recommendation" is very broad.

Under the conflict-of-interest rule, the implementation period of which began June 9, recommendations of investments and insurance products will be fiduciary advice; referrals to nondiscretionary and discretionary investment advisers will be fiduciary advice; recommendations about investment policies and strategies will be fiduciary advice; and recommendations to take distributions and rollovers from plans and to transfer IRAs will be fiduciary advice.

While the requirements for most of those recommendations have been thoroughly discussed, little has been said about prudent recommendations to transfer an IRA from another firm to the adviser's firm.

There are three ways in which an IRA can be transferred. The first is "unsolicited," the second is "education," and the third is a fiduciary recommendation. Unsolicited and education transfers are not fiduciary advice and, thus, are not subject to the new rules. Let's look at each of those.

Briefly stated, an unsolicited transfer is one where the retirement investor decides on his/her own, perhaps because of a preexisting relationship with the adviser, to transfer an IRA to the adviser. In this case, the adviser did not make a recommendation or provide education. (In that regard, the DOL interprets "recommendation" in an expansive manner; it includes a "suggestion" that the retirement investor engage in, or refrain from, a particular course of action.)

The second approach — education — can be used by providing an IRA owner with information to consider when making a decision about transferring an IRA from one firm to another. To qualify as education, the discussions and materials must be unbiased and relatively complete, and cannot include even a suggestion that the IRA owner transfer his/her IRA to the adviser's firm.

If the educational approach is taken, it should be appropriately documented to protect against a disagreement about whether the adviser provided education or a recommendation. As an example, one educational approach would be to provide the IRA owner with a checklist of the factors to be considered for transferring an IRA; a brochure of the investments, services and costs at the adviser's firm; and a form on which the IRA owner acknowledges that the adviser did not recommend a transfer.

In addition, a conservative approach could include a script for discussion of the most important issues for IRA owners to consider. That would augment the checklist, but would highlight, in an educational manner, the most important issues for a typical IRA owner. The considerations in the checklist and script should include, at a minimum, the investments, services and costs for the current adviser, as well as those for a new adviser. The IRA owner would be instructed to take those factors into account in light of his or her needs, objectives, financial circumstances and risk tolerance.

The third alternative is for an adviser to make a recommendation. In that case, the adviser would have a duty to engage in a best-interest process to obtain the information needed for a prudent recommendation.

At a minimum, that would include, the investments, costs and services for the current IRA; the investments, costs and services for an IRA at the adviser's firm; and the needs and circumstances of the IRA owner. Once that information is obtained and reviewed, the adviser would need to prudently evaluate it, and then make a recommendation that is in the best interest of the IRA owner. In most cases, the investments and costs for both the current adviser and the recommending adviser will be similar. As a result, the analysis should turn on the services to be offered and their value to the retirement investor.

Regardless of the approach taken, it is important to document it. That is particularly true of the fiduciary approach because the Department of Labor takes the position that documentation is an integral part of a prudent process. However, it is also true of the unsolicited and educational alternatives, for risk management purposes,

These rules are now in effect. Advisers and their firms also need to have processes in place, including policies, procedures and documentation, to satisfy the requirements of the new rules.

Fred Reish is a partner at the law firm Drinker Biddle & Reath.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Upcoming Event

Nov 13


Best Practices Workshop

For the sixth year, InvestmentNews will host the Best Practices Workshop & Awards, bringing together the industry’s top-performing and most influential firms in one room for a full-day. This exclusive workshop and awards program for the... Learn more

Featured video


InvestmentNews celebrates diversity & inclusion in the financial advice business

Highlights of the Excellence in D&I Awards, showcasing the achievements of 26 individuals and firms that are moving the needle when it comes to diversity and inclusion.

Latest news & opinion

Don't be fooled by the numbers — the industry is in a dangerously vulnerable state

Last year's stock market gains helped advisers turn in solid growth in assets and revenue, but that growth could disappear in the next market downturn.

Divided we stand: How financial advisers view President Trump

InvestmentNews poll finds 49.2% approve of his performance, while 46.7% disapprove. How has that changed over the course of his presidency?

10 states with the most college student debt

Residents of these states have the most student debt when you consider their job opportunities.

Invesco to buy OppenheimerFunds

Deal brings Invesco another $246 billion in assets, as well as high-fee actively managed funds.

Dawn Bennett found guilty of $20 million Ponzi scheme

Jury took less than five hours to convict the former financial adviser and radio host.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print