Vanguard rolls out actively managed factor ETFs

The six ETFs and one mutual fund, which will focus on volatility, value, momentum, liquidity and quality, mark a departure from the money manager's storied promotion of passive index funds

Nov 28, 2017 @ 2:02 pm

By John Waggoner

Vanguard announced Tuesday its entry into factor ETFs, a move that's a sharp departure from its index-based exchange-traded funds — and, quite possibly, one designed to appeal to advisers.

Vanguard plans to roll out six new factor ETFs next year, specializing in minimum volatility, value, momentum, liquidity and quality. A sixth ETF will be a multifactor approach. The Valley Forge, Pa., company also will roll out a multifactor open-ended mutual fund.

Factor funds take one or more investment strategies, or factors, into their securities selection. Morningstar Inc. lists 21 factor mutual funds and 60 factor ETFs. Factor ETFs have attracted an estimated $3.1 billion the past 12 months, according to Morningstar.

The move is significant for several reasons.

The first is simply the Vanguard effect: The mutual fund behemoth vacuums up investor assets like an elephant sipping from a baby pool. Investors have poured an estimated $348.6 billion net inflow to Vanguard mutual funds and ETFs the 12 months ended October 31, according to Morningstar, giving the company a 23.6% market share. (Those figures exclude money market funds and fund of funds).

The five single-factor ETFs will have an estimated expense ratio of 0.13%, while the multifactor ETF and mutual fund will weigh in at 0.18%. iShares, the largest factor-fund provider, weighs in at 0.15% to 0.32% for its largest factor ETFs, and archrival Fidelity charges 0.29% for its factor offerings.

Vanguard's entry into the arena should send shivers down its competitors' spines. Its factor funds would be cheaper than iShares' offerings, which are the current leaders.

"The average Vanguard ETF has more than $10 billion in assets, and given their strong brand with advisers and retail investors, we expect these factor products to be successful in gathering assets early," said Todd Rosenbluth, senior director of ETF and mutual fund research at CFRA.

The new Vanguard ETFs are also a sharp departure from Vanguard's long-time promotion of capitalization-weighted index funds, championed by its founder, Jack Bogle. A 2011 Vanguard research paper, for example, "supports market-cap-weighted indexes over these alternative equity benchmarks, both for their theoretical basis and their practicality." A 2015 paper concluded, "By definition, alternatives to market-cap-weighted indexes, such as smart-beta strategies, should be considered active strategies, because their rules-based methodologies tend to generate meaningful security-level deviations, or tracking error, versus a broad market-cap index."

The new ETFs will follow no index, but rather broad guidelines as to how they select stocks, Mr. Rosenbluth said. And unlike other Vanguard ETF offerings, the new ETFs will reveal their holdings daily.

"Investors won't have the full road map, but they will have guidelines," Mr. Rosenbluth said. "They will be able to conduct due diligence based on holdings and costs rather than waiting three years."

Vanguard acknowledges that, like all factor funds, their performance won't track a broad-based index, and that some factors can go out of style for extended periods of time. For that reason, the funds might appeal more to advisers than individual investors. The multifactor ETF and mutual fund, however, seems more targeted at individual investors, said Dan Wiener, editor of the Independent Adviser for Vanguard Investors.

Mr. Wiener was skeptical of how useful the ETFs will be. The company has rolled out factor funds in Europe and Canada, but their assets aren't impressive, at least by Vanguard standards. The Canadian Vanguard Minimum Volatility ETF, for example, was rolled out in June 2016 and has $18 million in assets.

"Smart beta is a marketing gimmick: It's a way for companies to put an indexing sheen on active management," Mr. Wiener said. "All factors go in and out of favor and timing your purchases and sales of one or another factor is a fool's errand."

And, he said, Vanguard's record at multifactor investing is middling at best.

"Vanguard's multifactor product sounds an awful lot like their existing quantitative strategies used on funds like Strategic Equity, Strategic SmallCap Equity and U.S. Value," he said. "Sure, there are differences, but the bottom line is that Vanguard's record on these quant funds is decidedly poor."

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Upcoming Event

Oct 23

Conference

Women Adviser Summit - San Francisco

The InvestmentNews Women Adviser Summit, a one-day workshop now held in four cities due to popular demand, is uniquely designed for the sophisticated female adviser who wants to take her personal and professional self to the next level.... Learn more

Featured video

INTV

FPA's Shannon Pike: What's next for the financial advisory profession?

As we head toward 2019 and beyond, regulation and compensation will continue to dominate the headlines. Shannon Pike of the FPA explains.

Latest news & opinion

10 richest towns in America

These are the wealthiest American towns in the U.S. right now, according to a report from 24/7 Wall St. that concludes higher educational attainment contributed to higher-paying jobs in these locations.

What millionaires look for in an adviser

A list of factors that high-net-worth individuals will pay more for in regards to an adviser.

LPL rolls back recruiting policy aimed at driving more assets to its corporate RIA

LPL erases $50 million hurdle for new advisers to join so-called hybrid firms.

Don't be fooled by the numbers — the industry is in a dangerously vulnerable state

Last year's stock market gains helped advisers turn in solid growth in assets and revenue, but that growth could disappear in the next market downturn.

Divided we stand: How financial advisers view President Trump

InvestmentNews poll finds 49.2% approve of his performance, while 46.7% disapprove. How has that changed over the course of his presidency?

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print