On Retirement

Social Security rules for new retirees

Clients can claim benefits even if earnings exceed annual limit

Jan 8, 2018 @ 6:01 pm

By Mary Beth Franklin

I've received several questions from financial advisers recently asking what will happen to their clients who claim Social Security this year after they have already earned more than the annual earnings limit. Will their benefits be reduced or even eliminated?

No, their Social Security benefits will not be affected if they stop working once they claim benefits, no matter how much they earned this year prior to retirement. But if your clients continue to earn income —whether full-time, part-time or on a consulting basis — after they retire, their benefits could be reduced or temporarily wiped out depending on their age.

Under a special first-year-in-retirement rule, beneficiaries can get a full Social Security check for any whole month they are retired, regardless of their yearly earnings. In 2018, a person younger than full retirement age for the entire year is considered retired if monthly earnings are $1,420 or less.

For example, assume your client claims Social Security when he turns 62 in October 2018. He earns $45,000 through October before retiring from his primary job. In November, he takes a part-time job and earns $500 per month.

Although his earnings for the year substantially exceed the 2018 annual limit of $17,040, he will receive a Social Security payment for November and December because his earnings for those months are less than $1,420 ($17,040/12). But if he earns more than $1,420 in either November or December, he won't receive a benefit. Beginning in 2019, only the annual limit will apply to him.

If your client turns 66 this year, there is a higher earnings limit and the reduction for excess earnings is less. He can earn up to $45,360 in the months prior to his 66th birthday and benefits are reduced by $1 for every $3 earned over the annual limit. Once someone reaches full retirement age, the earnings restrictions disappear, meaning they can earn any amount of money while collecting Social Security without reducing their benefits.

Only wages or net self-employment income counts toward earnings limits. The Social Security Administration doesn't count income from other government benefits, investment earnings, interest, or income from pension or retirement plans. However, SSA does count an employee's contributions to a retirement plan if it is included in an employee's gross earnings.

Consider this scenario. Let's say your clients are a married couple. The husband is the larger earner and plans to wait until age 70 to claim his maximum retirement benefit. The wife has a smaller benefit on her own earnings record and plans to continue working part-time.

She files for benefits in January 2018 at age 62. Her reduced benefits for claiming early is $600 per month. During 2018, she plans to work and earn $22,000. That's $4,960 above the $17,040 annual limit.

Social Security would withhold $2,480 of her benefits, which is half of her excess earnings based on the rule that she must forfeit $1 in benefits for every $2 earned over the 2018 earnings limit of $17,040.

To do that, SSA would withhold all of her benefits from January 2018 through May 2018 ($600 x 5 = $3,000). Beginning in June 2018, she would receive her $600 Social Security benefit and she would receive that same monthly amount for the remainder of the year. In 2019, SSA would pay her an additional $520 ($3,000 - $2,480) that was withheld in May 2018.

Here's an added claiming strategy tip. Once the wife claims her benefits, the husband could file a restricted claim for spousal benefits if he is 66 or older (and born before 1954), which would allow him to collect half of his wife's full retirement age amount even though she collected reduced retirement benefits early. Meanwhile, his own benefit would continue to accrue delayed retirement credits of 8% per year up to age 70.

But if her benefits are reduced because of excess earnings, so are his because he is collecting on her record. However, having two or more family members claiming benefits on one earnings record can speed up the process of satisfying the earnings test.

Let's assume the husband's spousal benefit, based on half of his wife's full retirement age amount, is $380 for a total monthly household benefit of $980. Based on her excess earnings of $2,480, SSA would withhold the first three months of combined benefits ($980 x 3 = $2,940) and begin paying the couple in April — two months sooner than if the wife was the only one collecting benefits.

Benefits lost to excess earnings are not gone forever. Once you reach full retirement age, your monthly benefit will increase to account for those months in which benefits were withheld.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Upcoming event

Sep 10

Conference

Denver Women Adviser Summit

The InvestmentNews Women Adviser Summit, a one-day workshop now held in six cities due to popular demand, is uniquely designed for the sophisticated female adviser who wants to take her personal and professional self to the next level.... Learn more

Most watched

INTV

Young advisers envision a radically different business in five years

Fintech and sustainable investing are two factors being watched closely by some of the 2019 class of InvestmentNews' 40 Under 40.

INTV

Schwab's Jeff Kleintop: Prep for volatility given China trade uncertainties

China could be considered a developed market in five to seven years , according to Jeff Kleintop, chief global investment strategist, Charles Schwab.

Latest news & opinion

Funding for Reg BI, other SEC advice reform efforts denied in Waters amendment

House likely to approve measure that effectively kills rule package, but it faces uphill battle in Senate

Wall Street lashes out at Sanders' plan to pay off student debt with a securities trading tax

Financial pros argue that a transaction levy will hurt mom-and-pop investors along with investment houses.

GPB paid B-Ds and reps steep commissions to sell troubled private placements

GPB paid commissions of 9.3%, or $167 million altogether, on the firm's private placements.

Give us a break, active managers say

Seven portfolio managers share their outlooks for the rest of the year, generally agreeing that it's been hard for active managers to stand out.

GPB Capital reports decline in value of two biggest funds

One has dropped by 25.4% and the other by 39%, according to the company.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print