Oops! Unintended consequences of tax-law changes

Will clients become more interested in paying commissions? Will the new tax law steer more financial advisers toward independent channels? It could.

Jan 13, 2018 @ 6:00 am

By Greg Iacurci

The Republican tax bill, signed into law on Dec. 22, has a few unintended consequences for financial advisers.

Despite the steady shift from commissions to fee-based accounts, the former could now be slightly more attractive to clients. That's due to a mismatch — the new law eliminates the tax deduction for clients' investment advisory fees, due to the law's repeal of miscellaneous itemized deductions, but it doesn't eliminate a standing tax advantage for commissions.

"People really concerned about losing the deduction for their [advisory] fees might be more interested in paying commissions instead," Baird's Mr. Steffen said of clients.

Paying a commission dilutes an investor's capital gains tax. Imagine an investor buys a $100 stock that carries a $2 commission. When sold, for $110, there's another $2 commission. The net result would be a $6 gain, not $10, Mr. Steffen said.

Mr. Kitces of Pinnacle believes the tax benefit may cause some large advisory firms to launch their existing managed-account models and strategies in mutual funds or exchange-traded funds that are fully managed by the firm. The firm's fees would be assessed as a commission, rather than as a direct, nondeductible advisory fee from the client.

Further, the tax law's provision on pass-through businesses creates some "distorted incentives" for advisers, Mr. Kitces added.

Pass-through entities like sole proprietorships get a 20% deduction on their taxable income if their income falls under a certain threshold. The benefit fully phases out for many service businesses, including advisory firms, after $207,500 for single filers and $415,000 for married couples filing jointly.

(More: Tax law's pass-through provision could harm 401(k) plans)

Advisers at employee broker-dealers — for example, wirehouse brokerages and captive channels at firms like Ameriprise Financial and Raymond James — "will want to go to independent channels" and convert to a pass-through business to get the deduction, Mr. Kitces said, especially if their incomes were low enough to qualify for the 20% tax break.

Further, "junior" next-generation partners in advisory firms already structured as pass-throughs — those partners who have limited shares in the business and lower incomes — may, ironically, qualify for the 20% deduction while the founders likely wouldn't, Mr. Kitces added.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video


Where in the U.S. are RIAs growing the fastest?

InvestmentNews' deputy editor Robert Hordt talks to senior columnist Jeff Benjamin about his report on how registered investment advisers are faring in different regions of the country.

Latest news & opinion

Top 10 RIAs in the Northeast

These are the largest registered investment advice firms in the Northeastern U.S., in terms of assets under management.

10 predictions for financial advice in 2019

Deloitte expects these 10 changes will hit the financial advice business in 2019.

Midwestern magic? RIA assets soared nearly 30% there last year

Theories for what's driving the growth spurt abound, but it surpassed all other regions of the country.

8 apps advisers love for getting stuff done

We reached out to advisers to find out which apps they are using to run their business more efficiently.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print