InvestmentNews Editorials

Advisers should take SEC up on offer to waive penalties

This isn't exactly an amnesty program, but it's probably the closest thing

Feb 17, 2018 @ 6:00 am

Fans of golf know the sport as one in which participants call penalties on themselves. This is essentially what the Securities and Exchange Commission is now asking of financial advisers.

The commission's announcement last week, citing "widespread" lack of fee disclosures by advisers placing clients in higher-cost products when cheaper versions are available, is the latest example of the regulator asking advisers to step up before they get stepped on.

To encourage financial advisers to seize the moral high ground before it's too late, the SEC has sweetened the deal by agreeing not to impose monetary penalties against advisers who "self-report violations of the federal securities laws relating to certain mutual fund share classes and promptly return money to harmed clients."

It is a good offer, and any financial adviser currently violating the rules should jump at it. This isn't exactly an amnesty program, but it's probably the closest thing advisers are going to get.

If advisers haven't already noticed, the SEC is using whatever limited resources it has in making these kinds of violations a top priority.

As InvestmentNews senior reporter Mark Schoeff Jr. reported last week, despite tighter budgets, the SEC's use of data-driven initiatives makes it easier than ever to spot these kinds of violations.

It's not yet clear whether the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. will offer a similar self-reporting deal to brokers, but the agency has employed similar incentives to entice brokers to turn themselves in for failing to waive mutual-fund sales charges for eligible investors.

(More: If Finra eases firm oversight of outside business activities, broker-dealers could lose revenue)

We welcome any logical effort by regulators to help bring wayward brokers and advisers back in line.

But the bigger issue here is why, in this age of a heightened focus on fiduciary standards, some financial advisers still try to get away with such blatant rule violations?

If a higher risk of getting caught and an offer to do the right thing without facing a monetary penalty isn't enough to encourage an adviser to come forward, can you really call yourself a fiduciary?

In golf, a player typically calls a penalty on himself or herself after an unintentional rule violation. It is known as protecting the field, or in other words, acting as a fiduciary.

Likewise, in financial planning, which is neither a sport nor a game, the field needs protecting by advisers acting as fiduciaries all the time, not just when a regulator offers to relax the punishment for violations.


What do you think?

View comments

Most watched


Schwab's Jeff Kleintop: Prep for volatility given China trade uncertainties

China could be considered a developed market in five to seven years , according to Jeff Kleintop, chief global investment strategist, Charles Schwab.


Young advisers envision a radically different business in five years

Fintech and sustainable investing are two factors being watched closely by some of the 2019 class of InvestmentNews' 40 Under 40.

Latest news & opinion

TIAA exits the life insurance business

The move is a big deal for RIAs, experts say, since TIAA was one of only a few insurers to offer fee-only life policies.

Advisers step up efforts to help clients manage student loan debt

As some Democrats campaign to wipe the slate clean, financial planners focus on limiting the amount students borrow.

Funding for Reg BI, other SEC advice reform efforts denied in Waters amendment

House likely to approve measure that effectively kills rule package, but it faces uphill battle in Senate

Wall Street lashes out at Sanders' plan to pay off student debt with a securities trading tax

Financial pros argue that a transaction levy will hurt mom-and-pop investors along with investment houses.

GPB paid B-Ds and reps steep commissions to sell troubled private placements

GPB paid commissions of 9.3%, or $167 million altogether, on the firm's private placements.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print