Philips North America reaches $17 million settlement in 401(k) lawsuit

Excessive fees, as well as the retention of a low-yielding money market fund, were at the heart of the lawsuit

May 15, 2018 @ 12:28 pm

By Greg Iacurci

Philips North America has agreed to pay $17 million to settle a lawsuit alleging that the company breached its fiduciary duty in connection with the management of its 401(k) plan.

The settlement, which also included nonmonetary provisions, still must be approved by a judge. The Philips retirement plan has more than $3 billion.

"In addition to the compensation, the participants will be getting an improved plan with significant protections for them to build their retirement assets in the future," said Jerome Schlichter, a pioneer of 401(k) fee litigation who represented plaintiffs in the case.

Silvie Casanova, a Philips spokeswoman, said the company opted to settle despite disagreeing with the lawsuit's claims.

"The settlement allows Philips to avoid a protracted lawsuit and to put additional money toward plan participants' retirement savings rather than spending it on a costly legal battle," she said. "In agreeing to settle the matter, Philips did not make any admission of any facts, liability or wrongdoing and denies that it has engaged in any wrongful conduct."

Plaintiffs alleged that Philips caused its 401(k) plan to pay excessive investment management and administration fees, retain the Vanguard Prime Money Market Fund as the sole capital preservation option despite "microscopically low" yields, and keep the underperforming Principal Diversified Real Asset Fund.

(More: 10 big settlements in 401(k) excessive-fee lawsuits)

Philips agreed to other provisions, including hiring an independent consultant to review the fund lineup and make recommendations about whether to retain the money market fund and add a stable value or comparable fund, and conducting a request for proposal process for record-keeping services.

The case, Todd Ramsay et al v. Philips North America LLC, was settled early in the litigation process. Plaintiffs filed the lawsuit Thursday in Illinois District Court, and the parties filed their joint motion for preliminary approval of the settlement just one day later, on Friday.

(More: What a court decision teaches 401(k) advisers about choosing stable-value funds)

However, the parties had been in contact for more than 18 months, with Philips producing documentation for the plaintiffs after they pursued legal action; the parties entering into "arm's length negotiations" six months ago, according to the settlement filing.

"There's been a process that's been lengthy arriving at this," Mr. Schlichter said. "A case like this has to be approved by a federal court. So the case had to be filed for the court to approve the settlement."

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Most watched

Events

Finding your edge from Tony Robbins

Guru Tony Robbins has helped a lot of people, but armed with his psychology Financial Advisor Josh Nelson has helped his practice soar.

Events

Finding innovation in your firm

Adam Holt of AssetMap explains how advisers understand they need to grow, but great innovation may be lurking right under your nose.

Latest news & opinion

SEC sets June 5 date for vote on Regulation Best Interest

Commission adds new item to agenda: Interpretation of broker guidance that qualifies as advice

House passes SECURE retirement bill with massive bipartisan support

The measure allows small employers to band together to offer plans and raises the RMD age. Another provision eases use of annuities in 401(k)s, which critics say goes too far

10 IBDs with the most annuity revenue

Here are the independent broker-dealers that brought in the most annuity revenue last year.

DOL sets date to propose new fiduciary rule

The regulation, expected in December, likely will be contoured to the SEC's new advice standards.

LPL expanding platform to include employee brokers

The largest IBD in the country has agreed to buy a small broker-dealer in Florida to kick off the new effort.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print