InvestmentNews Editorials

Transparency, credibility, fairness: Finra's decision to explain rationale for penalties is a welcome one

Agency strikes a balance between punishment and deterrence

May 19, 2018 @ 6:00 am

The object​ of all justice systems should be, in the words of Gilbert and Sullivan: "To let the punishment fit the crime."

Systems of justice are more likely to achieve the dual objectives of punishment and deterrence when all can see that the severity of the punishment is appropriate to the seriousness of the violation — and when people understand the factors that went into determining that punishment.

Finra's decision to provide more explanation of the rationale for penalties levied on firms and individuals for violations of its rules and federal securities laws is therefore welcome.

The move was foreshadowed in February in a speech by Susan Schroeder, Finra's executive vice president for enforcement, and has now been demonstrated in a footnote in a settlement letter imposing a $4 million fine to Fifth Third Securities Inc. over the sale of variable annuities.

The footnote outlined the agency's reasons for the severity of the fine: the harm to customers caused by the firm's violations, the breadth and extended duration of the violations, and the firm's recidivism and its failure to comply with prior regulatory action.

Inspires confidence

It is apparent from the footnote that the punishment fits the violations and gives confidence that the aggravating aspects of the case have been weighed, the level of the penalty has been carefully considered and the penalty is fair.

This transparency adds credibility to Finra's enforcement actions and to the fairness of the penalties imposed. It will allow all in the industry to observe whether the penalties Finra imposes are consistent across cases and across time. In doing so, it also imposes discipline upon Finra to ensure that its penalties are consistent.

Finra's object all sublime, it shall achieve in time — to let the punishment fit the crime. (With apologies to Gilbert and Sullivan.)


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video


Regulators' gloves are coming off with cybersecurity. Put up your dukes with these tips

Updated guidelines and some of the first-ever rule enforcements signal that regulators are getting serious about holding firms accountable for data breaches, according to special projects editor Liz Skinner and technology reporter Ryan Neal.

Latest news & opinion

John Bogle, Vanguard founder, dies at 89

The pioneer of low-cost, passive investments died of cancer.

10 biggest breakaways of Q4

Echelon Partners lists the 10 biggest adviser moves out of wirehouses during last year's final quarter.

6 biggest RIA acquisitions of 2018

As M&A involving registered investment advisers hit another record last year, these six deals topped the list

Anatomy of an annuity buyout offer

Readers are invited to comment on whether the columnist should keep or ditch her Ohio National VA contract

Factions emerge in OneFPA overhaul

Critics fear the FPA is trying to take money and power from local chapters, which officials and proponents call overblown.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print