Advisers on the Move

After firms dump protocol, advisers show reluctance to make a move

Observers say there's fear of potential lawsuits that quash contact with clients when a broker or adviser seeks a new employer

Jun 5, 2018 @ 3:06 pm

By Bruce Kelly

Last fall, Morgan Stanley and UBS Wealth Management Americas left an agreement among brokerage firms that allowed brokers and advisers to take a limited amount of client information to a new employer without being sued. Called the Protocol for Broker Recruiting, it was a peace treaty on Wall Street that has been in place since 2004.

The two wirehouses dumping the protocol last year appear to have slowed down financial adviser recruiting during the first three months of 2018. Brokers and advisers are sizing up their options and are particularly fearful of getting hit with potential lawsuits that quash contact with clients when a broker leaves one firm for a new employer, industry recruiters and observers have said.

According to InvestmentNews data, 81 teams of advisers moved to different broker-dealers in the first quarter of the year, compared to 144 during the final three months of 2017. That's a decline of almost 44% of advisers moving to a new employer. (For a same-period comparison, 148 teams moved firms in the first quarter of 2017.)

Two large firms pulling out of the broker protocol may have delayed some advisers from moving to a new firm, but that doesn't mean those advisers are not looking to move to a new employer, said Mark Albers, an industry recruiter who focuses on the wirehouses.

"It's been more like tapping the brakes as opposed to slamming on the brakes," Mr. Albers said. "Some big firms are on the move and there are a lot more in the wings. There's a lot of preparation taking place."

"This was the first full quarter after the departures of Morgan Stanley and UBS from the protocol," said Danny Sarch, an industry recruiter. "Even if an adviser is absolutely miserable at a firm, that's a yellow light of caution to see what happens to advisers when they leave."

"It's the bold adviser who wants to be first to move under new rules," he said. "Changing firms for advisers has always been a long process and it's longer now. Moving to RIAs and independent firms from the wirehouses is continuing, but you can't underestimate how long that takes."

InvestmentNews' data for advisers moving in the first quarter, however, does not include LPL Financial, one of the most active recruiting broker-dealers in the industry. An LPL spokesperson said the company is changing how it reports the hiring of advisers and information was not available. InvestmentNews uses its own reports as well as those of other publications to compile its "Advisers on the Move" list.

LPL saw net gains of 27 and 43 teams of advisers, respectively, during last year's third and fourth quarters. If it had reported similar numbers of teams of advisers joining the firm in the first quarter of 2018, the overall decline would have existed but not been as pronounced.

At least one large firm saw the slowdown in advisers moving during the first quarter of the year. Wells Fargo Advisors reported a decline in recruiting of 15% across its three business channels: traditional wealth management, independent reps and advisers, and banks.

"We are staying in the broker protocol, but also recruit from non-protocol firms," said Heather Hunt-Ruddy, head of client experience and growth at Wells Fargo Advisors.

Meanwhile, Ms. Hunt-Ruddy said adviser attrition at Wells Fargo had declined by about 25% over the first three months of the year.

InvestmentNews reported last month that Wells Fargo Advisors had slowed the bleeding of its financial advisers that began after September 2016. That's when parent company Wells Fargo & Co. revealed a scandal in its retail banking that resulted in the company being fined $185 million for opening accounts for a few million customers without their knowledge — a public relations nightmare that also alienated some of the firm's advisers.

It has been a rough go at Wells Fargo Advisors since then. Over the 18 months from September 2016 to March 31, Wells Fargo saw a 4.5% decline in its adviser workforce, falling from 15,086 in September 2016 to 14,399 at the end of March.

"A lot of work has been done, and no one likes to be in the news," Ms. Hunt-Ruddy said. "It's a challenge and going to remain a challenge, but I hear less about it from recruits."


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Upcoming Event

Nov 13


Best Practices Workshop

For the sixth year, InvestmentNews will host the Best Practices Workshop & Awards, bringing together the industry’s top-performing and most influential firms in one room for a full-day. This exclusive workshop and awards program for the... Learn more

Featured video


Financial advisers highlight solutions to increase diversity and inclusion

These Excellence in Diversity & Inclusion award winners suggest short-term changes to help foster D&I in the financial advice profession.

Latest news & opinion

Ex-Wells Fargo brokers sue for damages, claiming they lost business in wake of scandals

In a Finra arbitration complaint, two brokers allege that Wells Fargo's problems damaged their business.

Invesco to buy OppenheimerFunds

Deal brings Invesco another $246 billion in assets, as well as high-fee actively managed funds.

Dawn Bennett found guilty of $20 million Ponzi scheme

Jury took less than five hours to convict the former financial adviser and radio host.

10 advisory firm employee benefits you won't believe

Some advisory firms stand out for their creative efforts to keep their troops happy and engaged. Spa retreat, anyone?

401(k) record keepers seek new revenue streams to 'save themselves'

Service providers are getting pinched by fee compression.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print