Galvin charges MetLife with inflating bottom line

Massachusetts securities czar says insurer's failure to make pension payments enabled it to lower reserves

Jun 25, 2018 @ 12:58 pm

By InvestmentNews

Continuing to turn the heat on MetLife, Massachusetts securities regulator William F. Galvin has charged the insurer with issuing misleading statements relating to its failure to make pension payments to hundreds of retirees in the state that it had wrongly designated as "presumed dead."

In a complaint filed by his office, Secretary of the Commonwealth Galvin alleged that MetLife's public filings contained material misstatements about the company's finances resulting from the insurer's failure to adequately administer employer pension plans. Under these pension plans, MetLife was responsible for reserving enough money to make payments to Massachusetts pensioners, whose average age was 72. Instead, when the company erroneously assumed some pensioners were dead, it released reserves held against pension obligations, which became assets that inflated MetLife's bottom line.

The charges are the result of an investigation opened last December, after MetLife announced that it had lost track of tens of thousands of pensioners to whom they owed payments. MetLife had acquired the pension obligations from the retirees' employers.

Mr. Galvin said that once his office was notified of the "missing" Massachusetts pensioners, it was able to locate the majority of them "within just a few weeks."

"In fact, approximately half of these seniors were still living at the same address MetLife had on file for them for the entire time MetLife failed to make payments to them," he said.

Once a plan participant was presumed dead by MetLife, the money to which the retiree was entitled was no longer held in reserve by the company and became assets of MetLife, which were reported in public filings. The complaint states that these reserves should not have been released and resulted in misleading financial statements.

Last week, MetLife and its spin-off, Brighthouse Financial, were sued for failing to pay at least $500 million in retirement benefits over the past 2½ decades to thousands of pension plan participants.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

INTV

Where in the U.S. are RIAs growing the fastest?

InvestmentNews' deputy editor Robert Hordt talks to senior columnist Jeff Benjamin about his report on how registered investment advisers are faring in different regions of the country.

Latest news & opinion

Midwestern magic? RIA assets soared nearly 30% there last year

Theories for what's driving the growth spurt abound, but it surpassed all other regions of the country.

8 apps advisers love for getting stuff done

We reached out to advisers to find out which apps they are using to run their business more efficiently.

10 tax moves to squeeze in before the year ends

Here are some tax moves clients can still make before year-end.

Richard Neal: the new face driving retirement policy in Washington

As he becomes head of the House Ways and Means Committee, Rep. Richard Neal (D-Mass.) is poised to make some big changes.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print