Trump gives federal agencies power to hire in-house judges

Administration seeks to head off turmoil resulting from Supreme Court's recent decision on administrative law judges

Jul 11, 2018 @ 10:28 am

By Bloomberg News

President Donald J. Trump, seeking to head off some of the turmoil from a recent Supreme Court decision, issued an order Tuesday empowering the heads of federal agencies to directly appoint judges who decide cases ranging from Wall Street sanctions to environmental disputes.

The Supreme Court undermined the authority of administrative law judges last month by ruling that they are constitutional officers, potentially casting doubt on whether some of their appointments were properly handled and opening up hundreds of cases to potential legal challenges.

The Supreme Court ruling pertained to the Securities and Exchange Commission, a top financial regulator that is one of dozens of federal agencies that use the in-house judges to rule on internal trials and disputes. Now, many other cases may have to be reconsidered because of improperly hired judges, said James Sherk, a special assistant to the president for domestic policy.

"We're already aware of hundreds of these challenges being brought," Mr. Sherk told reporters Tuesday.

Mr. Trump's order grants agency chiefs greater leeway to choose judges, which could also allow them to ratify currently sitting judges at the Social Security Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Labor and several other agencies — including a number of financial regulators. Still, the Supreme Court decision leaves many of the administrative law judges' past decisions in jeopardy.

The high court said administrative law judges must be appointed by the president or heads of agencies, not hired as ordinary government workers. Mr. Trump's order discards a complex Office of Personnel Management selection process and establishes a new employment status that allows agencies to appoint judges much like they now hire federal attorneys.

(More: Supreme Court ruling on SEC judges unlikely to upend advice industry)


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video


How InvestmentNews picks its Women to Watch winners

The process is laborious and exacting, but well worth it. The end result each year is an impressive group of women in the advice industry from whom others can draw inspiration.

Latest news & opinion

Some good news about female recruitment in financial advice

Each of four core advisory positions tracked in InvestmentNews' benchmarking study has seen an uptick in women entrants.

10 ETFs that are up more than 35% this year

Amid the stock market carnage, there are still some funds posting big gains.

10 biggest HSA providers rated

Morningstar rated the largest plan providers as investment and spending vehicles.

6 tax strategies for year-end planning

How to help clients maximize their wealth using specific tax strategies before the end of the year.

6 mistakes advisers make when onboarding new clients

Starting a new relationship with a client is harder than it looks.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print