InvestmentNews INsider

The INsiderblog

InvestmentNews reporters offer their take on intriguing or controversial articles from around the web.

Fidelity's zero-cost funds raise issues for 401(k) advisers

Fiduciary advisers should be weighing the risks and upsides of securities lending

Aug 2, 2018 @ 4:22 pm

By Greg Iacurci

Fidelity Investments is making 401(k) advisers' lives a little more complicated.

The Boston-based behemoth dropped some eye-popping news Wednesday: as of Friday, it will begin offering two index mutual funds with a price tag of 0.00%. Yes, funds free of cost to investors — the industry's first.

The funds, in the total-market and international equity categories, will be available to retail investors. They won't be offered to participants in defined-contribution plans, at least initially. But let's not kid ourselves — it's only a matter of time before Fidelity or another index-fund giant, perhaps BlackRock Inc. or Vanguard Group, brings a no-cost fund to 401(k) investors.

"It could be a fire-starter," said Philip Chao, principal and chief investment officer at Chao & Co.

It wouldn't be a surprise. No-cost funds represent the extreme of a trend that's been playing out for years in retirement plans. The average asset-weighted expense ratio of index mutual funds has been dropping steadily in 401(k)s — they fell 0.07% (or 7 basis points), to 0.09%, just from 2009 to 2015, according to a report published this year by BrightScope Inc. and the Investment Company Institute.

The introduction of a zero-expense fund to retirement plans would be a marketing play, pure and simple, to attract advisers, plan sponsors and investors, and bring more assets to the firm.

Fidelity has lost ground in the DC-plan asset-manager rankings in the last several years. Going back to 2012, Fidelity was the No. 1 player, with $524 billion in DC assets under management, according to data from InvestmentNews sister publication Pensions & Investments. That pot grew to $715 billion by the end of 2017, but Fidelity now lags behind both Vanguard and BlackRock, which managed $1.1 trillion and $855 billion, respectively.

(More: Fidelity charging new fee on Vanguard assets held in 401(k) plans)

A mediocre 401(k) adviser would likely embrace one of these zero-expense funds, whichever asset manager is providing them, without question. But a good one would realize that there's a hidden risk for participants.

Fidelity isn't running a charity for retail investors. Observers say the company will still make money via securities lending, which entails loaning securities out to borrowers for profit. Fidelity isn't the only asset manager to engage in the practice — almost all index providers engage in securities lending, Mr. Chao said.

Fidelity spokeswoman Nicole Abbott said the firm is not receiving any revenue from its zero-expense funds for securities lending. She also said Fidelity isn't currently receiving any portion of the income that is generated from securities lent out. But that doesn't mean other providers would act similarly.

The index versus active fund debate is a seemingly unending one in the 401(k) industry, given the focus on cost. But the industry rarely if ever discusses the characteristics of index funds beyond their cost and asset class. Does a fiduciary investment adviser owe clients a deeper examination of each index fund? Should they scrutinize the provider's securities-lending policies?

There are at least some advisers who think the answer is "yes."

"As I see it, sure," said Ellen Lander of Renaissance Benefit Advisors Group. "It's an evaluation of the fund."

Each company does securities lending a different way, and the practice comes with inherent risks, advisers said.

"I think it's a fiduciary responsibility to think about the risk, talk about the risk and assess whether the upside is worthy of the risk," Mr. Chao said.

If you subscribe to this philosophy, the responsibility has existed all along — no matter the cost of an index fund — if you think about it. But Fidelity is bringing the subject squarely into focus by virtue of its new funds.

And here's some more food for thought: Like interest rates in some countries, could fees potentially dip below zero sometime down the road?

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

RIA Data Center

Use InvestmentNews' RIA Data Center to filter and find key information on over 1,400 fee-only registered investment advisory firms.

Rank RIAs by

Upcoming Event

Nov 13

Conference

Best Practices Workshop

For the sixth year, InvestmentNews will host the Best Practices Workshop & Awards, bringing together the industry’s top-performing and most influential firms in one room for a full-day. This exclusive workshop and awards program for the... Learn more

Featured video

INTV

Financial health of advisory firms is excellent. Or is it?

Deputy editor Bob Hordt and senior columnist Jeff Benjamin discuss the fact that double-digit growth in revenue and assets doesn't necessarily spell a rosy future.

Latest news & opinion

Don't be fooled by the numbers — the industry is in a dangerously vulnerable state

Last year's stock market gains helped advisers turn in solid growth in assets and revenue, but that growth could disappear in the next market downturn.

Divided we stand: How financial advisers view President Trump

InvestmentNews poll finds 49.2% approve of his performance, while 46.7% disapprove. How has that changed over the course of his presidency?

10 states with the most college student debt

Residents of these states have the most student debt when you consider their job opportunities.

Ex-Wells Fargo brokers sue for damages, claiming they lost business in wake of scandals

In a Finra arbitration complaint, two brokers allege that Wells Fargo's problems damaged their business.

Invesco to buy OppenheimerFunds

Deal brings Invesco another $246 billion in assets, as well as high-fee actively managed funds.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print