Fidelity's zero-fee funds unleash the power of free

The asset manager's move will trigger a transformation of the fund industry

Aug 2, 2018 @ 3:16 pm

By Nir Kaissar

Fidelity Investments fired a shot heard around the investing world Wednesday: It announced it would roll out two index mutual funds Friday that charge no fees.

Both funds will track market cap-weighted Fidelity indexes. The Fidelity Zero Total Market Index Fund will invest in the largest 3,000 U.S. companies based on float-adjusted market cap, and the Fidelity Zero International Index Fund will hold the top 90% of stocks within various developed international and emerging countries.

It's tempting to dismiss the move as a marketing stunt. Fidelity doesn't need the money. I counted more than 1,000 Fidelity mutual funds, including the various share classes, with close to $1.9 trillion in assets and an asset-weighted average expense ratio of 0.46 percent a year. That translates into roughly $9 billion of annual revenue.

And that's just the beginning because Fidelity does more than manage mutual funds. As Russel Kinnel, director of manager research at Morningstar, told Bloomberg News, "Fidelity has lots of ways to make money from customers once they are in the door."

Also, only so many firms have the scale to follow Fidelity's lead. And many that do, such as Vanguard Group, BlackRock Inc. and Charles Schwab Corp., already offer comparably priced funds. The Schwab Total Stock Market Index Fund, for example, charges 0.03% a year, and the Schwab International Index Fund charges 0.06%.

The difference between 0.03% and zero, however, will prove to be bigger than three basis points. Yes, cheap is great, but free is irresistible, particularly in an industry notorious for gouging its customers. The funds will sell themselves — as I'm sure Fidelity intends — and competitors will eventually have to follow.

The knock-on effects will be significant. For starters, index funds will no longer tolerate paying license fees to index providers for market cap-weighted indexes such as the S&P 500 Index or the Russell 2000 Index. Index providers will have to waive those license fees or watch their iconic indexes become increasingly sidelined when fund companies create their own indexes, as Fidelity is doing and as Schwab and State Street Global Advisors have already done.

(More: Invesco joins the do-it-yourself indexing trend)

That doesn't mean index providers will be poorer. On the contrary, the index explosion will continue as index providers race to create ever more specialized indexes that imitate hedge fund strategies and traditional active styles, and cater to investors' growing interest in socially responsible investing.

The funds that license those indexes will continue to displace hedge funds and traditional active managers, including those at Fidelity. They'll charge far less than traditional managers for nearly identical strategies, but comfortably more than zero. The asset-weighted average expense ratio for smart beta mutual funds and exchange-traded funds — index funds that mimic traditional active strategies such as value, quality and momentum — is 0.23% a year, according to Morningstar data. That's more than enough to pay index providers their license fees.

As a result, portfolio construction will become increasingly complicated. Many investors will struggle to assemble a portfolio from the huge variety of index funds. The fees they once paid to fund managers will go to asset allocators, although they, too, will have to reduce fees. (Disclosure: My asset-management firm offers asset-allocation strategies.)

At the same time, do-it-yourself investors who are content to buy the market will be big winners, and they're in good company. Warren Buffett has famously said that 90% of the money he leaves to his wife will be invested in an S&P 500 index fund. For the first time, investors can keep the bounty of that portfolio — or a globally diversified equivalent — all to themselves.

The biggest change will be to retirement plans such as 401(k)s, 403(b)s and other defined-contribution plans. Participants in those plans will demand to know why they pay so much for funds that are free elsewhere. The asset-weighted average expense ratio of retirement share class mutual funds is a whopping 0.61% a year. Retirement plans will be forced to slash fees — a long overdue boon to retirement savers.

Mark the date Aug. 1, 2018. It's the day fund fees became a big deal to more than industry observers and investing buffs, to transformative effect.

(More: Vanguard crushed active investing. Now it could save it)

Nir Kaissar is a Bloomberg Gadfly columnist.


What do you think?

View comments

Upcoming event

Oct 22


San Francisco Women Adviser Summit

The InvestmentNews Women Adviser Summit, a one-day workshop now held in six cities due to popular demand, is uniquely designed for the sophisticated female adviser who wants to take her personal and professional self to the next level.... Learn more

Most watched


Young advisers envision a radically different business in five years

Fintech and sustainable investing are two factors being watched closely by some of the 2019 class of InvestmentNews' 40 Under 40.


Schwab's Jeff Kleintop: Prep for volatility given China trade uncertainties

China could be considered a developed market in five to seven years , according to Jeff Kleintop, chief global investment strategist, Charles Schwab.

Latest news & opinion

Funding for Reg BI, other SEC advice reform efforts denied in Waters amendment

House likely to approve measure that effectively kills rule package, but it faces uphill battle in Senate

Wall Street lashes out at Sanders' plan to pay off student debt with a securities trading tax

Financial pros argue that a transaction levy will hurt mom-and-pop investors along with investment houses.

GPB paid B-Ds and reps steep commissions to sell troubled private placements

GPB paid commissions of 9.3%, or $167 million altogether, on the firm's private placements.

Give us a break, active managers say

Seven portfolio managers share their outlooks for the rest of the year, generally agreeing that it's been hard for active managers to stand out.

GPB Capital reports decline in value of two biggest funds

One has dropped by 25.4% and the other by 39%, according to the company.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print