Appeals court upholds dismissal of Wells Fargo 401(k) lawsuit

Participant argued that the plan could have offered a better-performing, nonproprietary TDF

Aug 6, 2018 @ 10:54 am

By Robert Steyer

A federal appeals court in St. Louis upheld a U.S. District Court judge's dismissal of an ERISA breach claim against Wells Fargo & Co. by a participant in the company's 401(k) plan, who alleged fiduciaries could have offered a better-performing nonproprietary investment choice.

The complaint "failed to plausibly allege a breach of fiduciary duty," according to the unanimous ruling by a three-judge panel. "The complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted."

In the case of Meiners et al. vs. Wells Fargo & Co et al., a U.S. District Court Judge in Minneapolis had dismissed the complaint in May 2017.

(More: Wells Fargo sued, again, for using in-house funds in 401(k) plan)

The participant, John Meiners, had argued that including the Wells Fargo Dow Jones Target Date Funds series was an ERISA violation because a similar target-date series from Vanguard Group had better returns.

"A comparison of the returns of two different funds is insufficient" to prove a fiduciary breach, U.S. District Court Judge David S. Doty wrote. The Wells Fargo series, he noted, had a higher allocation of bonds than the Vanguard series.

"The District Court correctly determined that Meiners' omission of any meaningful benchmark in his complaint mean that he failed to allege any facts showing the Wells Fargo [target-date funds] were an imprudent choice," the appeals court wrote. "As a result, Meiners' complaint failed to state a claim for relief under ERISA and we affirm its dismissal."

The Wells Fargo & Co. 401(k) Plan had $45.9 billion in assets as of Dec. 31, 2017, according to its latest 11-K filing.

(More: 401(k) lawsuits being brought more aggressively against retirement plan advisers)

Robert Steyer is a reporter for InvestmentNews' sister publication Pensions & Investments.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended next

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print