Slow down! Lessons from a flash crash

Just because an ETF allows investors to trade immediately doesn't mean they should

Sep 8, 2018 @ 6:00 am

By John Waggoner

A little over three years ago — Aug. 24, 2015 — the S&P 500 plunged 5.3% in just a few minutes. The flash crash spooked stock investors, but it was particularly terrifying for investors in exchange-traded funds: iShares Select Dividend ETF (DVY) dived 36%, Guggenheim S&P 500 Equal Weight (RSP) tumbled 42% and iShares Conservative Allocation Fund (AOK) dropped 50%.

The 2015 flash crash wasn't unprecedented: In 2010, another flash crash dropped some ETF prices as much as 60% in a span of just 20 minutes, according to the Securities and Exchange Commission. For a few horrific seconds, shares of the iShares Russell 1000 Growth Index ETF (IWF) traded for a penny. Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) sold for 13 cents.

What happened? In short, market makers walked away at the worst possible time.

Can it happen again— Yes.

ETF pricing depends on the ability of large investors to arbitrage the difference between the value of an ETF's underlying shares and its market price. When the two prices diverge too far, institutional investors can buy or sell creation units – blocks of stock in proportion to an ETF's holdings – and profit from the price difference between the two. In normal times, this keeps a fund's net asset value and its market price reasonably closely aligned.

All of this depends on a properly functioning exchange, though. During the two flash crashes, market orders were so unbalanced that trading creation units — bundles that may contain more than 500 securities, as in the case of the Vanguard offering — was nearly impossible. In the 2015 crash, there were 1,278 trading halts involving 471 different stocks and ETFs.

"Anything that happens at the exchange level tied to stocks inside the ETF will impact the ETF," said Todd Rosenbluth, senior director of ETF and mutual fund research at CFRA.

The 2015 flash crash occurred during the first few minutes of trading on a Monday. Some investors, worried about emerging-market problems and Chinese markets, had put in orders to sell over the weekend. What they didn't realize was that a market order executes at the first available bid, which can be far below its Friday closing price. Those who put in stop-loss orders suffered the same fate: If you put in an order to sell at $100 per share, you get the next bid, which could be $50 or less. The same rules would apply for stocks, Mr. Rosenbluth noted.

After the 2010 flash crash, the Securities and Exchange Commission modified some of its rules on trading halts. The new rules provide for halts when a stock rises or falls a specified percentage from its recent trading ranges, rather than by a percentage limit from its previous sale. As bad as the 2015 flash crash was, it would have been worse without those rules.

The revised rules don't preclude another flash crash, although they do seem to have lessened the problems from the most recent one. According to the SEC, 80% of all exchange-traded products didn't experience a trading halt in 2015, and most of the halts occurred in smaller ETPs.

Perhaps the biggest problem stems from ETF investors themselves. One of the major criticisms of ETFs is that they allow investors to trade immediately — something that most investors probably shouldn't do.

"My thesis is that ETFs are fine as long as you don't trade them," John Bogle, Vanguard's founder, told InvestmentNews in 2016. "As long as they're not traded, they can be more convenient for some people."

Trading on gut feelings often leads to nausea.

"You shouldn't trade on a whim just because you have the ability to," Mr. Rosenbluth said. "Investing in a diversified product doesn't eliminate trading-related snafus."

If you don't understand how market orders and stop-loss orders work, you could be bellyaching about your trades for a long time.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Upcoming Event

May 16

Conference

Chicago Women Adviser Summit

The InvestmentNews Women Adviser Summit, a one-day workshop now held in six cities due to popular demand, is uniquely designed for the sophisticated female adviser who wants to take her personal and professional self to the next level....

Featured video

INTV

Why a #MeToo story about the financial advice industry was important to do

Reporter Greg Iacurci and editorial director Fred Gabriel discuss the survey behind our cover story on sexual harassment in the workplace.

Video Spotlight

We started as a boutique firm with huge ambitions. Schwab was a perfect fit.

Sponsored by Schwab Advisor Services

Recommended Video

Keys to a successful deal

Latest news & opinion

10 millennials making their mark in Washington — and beyond

These next-generation leaders are raising their voices and gaining influence over financial advice regulation and legislation.

Warburg Pincus among private equity managers interested in acquiring Kestra Financial

Sources say Kestra is being valued at between $600 million and $800 million, about eight to 10 times EBITDA.

10 highest paid professions in America today

These are the top-paying jobs in the U.S., according to Glassdoor.

Former Merrill Lynch star broker Thomas Buck sentenced to 40 months in prison

He pleaded guilty to securities fraud in 2017; charged clients excessive commissions.

Rules for claiming Social Security at 70

Some individuals' benefits will begin automatically; others have to take action.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print