InvestmentNews Editorials

Investors, don't lose sleep over the midterm elections

Historically speaking, the worst is behind us

Oct 20, 2018 @ 6:00 am

The early October jolt of stock market volatility seemed to awaken investors briefly from a relative sense of calm and reminded us that pullbacks and downside risk are part of the price to be paid for upside performance.

Despite just about every investing fear imaginable, any long-term snapshot of stock market performance will illustrate a persistent bias toward positive performance. Whether looking back 10, 50, 100 years or more, the basic economics of investing in a broad range of publicly traded companies is difficult to deny.

Of course, we also know that looking at the 100-year ascent of the Dow Jones Industrial Average provides little comfort to somebody who is watching their retirement savings drop by 3% or more in a single day.

On the subject of whether more market shake-ups are ahead, most financial advisers are rightly positioning the possible impact of the midterm elections along the lines of: "We're long-term investors" or "We don't have a crystal ball."

And considering the markets' nonreaction to the unexpected election of President Donald J. Trump, maybe there is something to be said for not worrying about it.

But if that won't suffice, just consider how three possible midterm election scenarios could affect the markets.

The most likely scenario shifts control of the House of Representatives from Republicans to Democrats.

Because this is considered most likely, it is the outcome that would be the least jarring to the financial markets initially.

Long term, a divided government usually means little gets done legislatively.

If the Democrats gain control of both houses of Congress or the Republicans retain control, the long-term outlook either takes the shape of uber-gridlock or more of the same, legislatively speaking.

In terms of market impact, consider that since 1949, the third quarter of a midterm election year has averaged the second-worst performance of the 16 quarters making up a four-year presidential term.

The S&P 500 Index averaged a gain of 0.1% during those quarters. The worst quarter in the cycle is the second quarter of a midterm year, averaging -2.8%.

In other words, the worst is behind us, historically speaking.

The good news is the fourth quarter of a midterm election year has averaged a gain of 8%, and the first quarter of the following year has averaged a gain of 7.5%.

(More: Divided we stand: How financial advisers view President Trump)

Of course, we all know past performance is no guarantee ...

But beyond any anticipated reactions from financial markets, there is the pragmatic reality of how the election outcome will affect the financial services industry.

As InvestmentNews senior reporter Mark Schoeff Jr. laid out in last week's cover story, if Democrats take control of the House, that could alter the course for such major issues as the Securities and Exchange Commission's proposed advice rule, additional tax reform and retirement savings.

Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., the top Democrat on the House Financial Services Committee, and the ranking members of other committees showed their hand in a Sept. 12 letter to SEC chairman Jay Clayton. The letter criticized the agency's Regulation Best Interest as too weak.

Mark also reported on Democratic opposition to further tax cuts in the vein of those already passed, and the potential positive effect on retirement savings policies. If Democrats take the house, expect Rep. Richard Neal, D-Mass., to become chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee. He is a vocal advocate of measures that encourage Americans to save more for retirement.

As is often the case, there is much at stake, which is why we vote.

But what should not be keeping investors awake at night is how whatever happens on Nov. 6 could disrupt a solid, long-term investing strategy.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Upcoming Event

May 16


Chicago Women Adviser Summit

The InvestmentNews Women Adviser Summit, a one-day workshop now held in six cities due to popular demand, is uniquely designed for the sophisticated female adviser who wants to take her personal and professional self to the next level.... Learn more

Featured video


Forecasting a revolution in financial planning tools

Special projects editor Liz Skinner and reporter Ryan W. Neal discuss the technology behind financial planning software and how it is helping spur change in the adviser and investor experience.

Latest news & opinion

Former adviser gave college football players money to win business later

Louis 'Marty' Blazer said he gave $10,000 to a player with hopes he could represent him when he turned pro.

Finra suspends former star LPL rep who borrowed client cash

Regulator says James E. 'Jeb' Bashaw borrowed $200,000 from a client in 2013 without telling LPL.

Higher tax bills following reform surprise clients

Lower withholding and the loss of state and local deductions throw many for loop.

Centerbridge said to be in talks to buy Advisor Group

Advisor Group's independent broker-dealer network in the U.S. has more than 7,000 advisers.

The drawback of Richard Thaler's 401(k)-Social Security idea? Social Security itself

Observers think Congress would need to address Social Security's funding levels and offer enhanced protections for the concept to work


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print