Understanding the Nuances of Irrevocable Trusts

Nov 1, 2018 @ 12:01 am

A successful estate plan involves minimizing taxes while transferring wealth to the next generation in an efficient manner. To achieve this goal, many turn to the irrevocable trust. As you may know, property transferred to an irrevocable trust is removed from the grantor's estate. In addition, because this type of trust requires the full relinquishment of and control over transferred assets, many believe that this will preserve the assets for their beneficiaries. But what if the beneficiary is financially irresponsible or undergoes a contentious divorce? Will the irrevocable nature of the trust still protect those assets from creditors or an ex-spouse?

Before we get into the nuances of irrevocable trusts, let's review the basics.

Terms to Know

First, it's important to understand trust terminology:

  1. Irrevocable trust: The purpose of the trust is outlined by an attorney in the trust document. Once established, an irrevocable trust usually cannot be changed. As soon as assets are transferred in, the trust becomes the asset owner.
  2. Grantor: This individual transfers ownership of property to the trust.
  3. Trustee: The trustee is the person or corporation charged with managing the property in the trust and carrying out its purpose and function. The trustee has a fiduciary duty to the beneficiary(ies) of the trust.
  4. Beneficiary: The beneficiary is the person for whom the trust was created and who will receive the trust benefits.

It's important to note that trust interpretation is primarily a state law issue. As such, courts may use the trust document to evaluate whether a beneficiary has control over fund distribution. If the court determines that the beneficiary does not have control:

  1. Trust assets cannot be considered a marital asset in a divorce.
  2. Trust assets cannot be reachable by creditors.

On the other hand, some courts look beyond this control issue. These and other factors in the trust's design and language may further complicate this issue.

Who Can Claim the Assets

To illustrate the complexity of trust interpretation, let's look at an example.

Jane is getting older and wants her estate plan in order. She's earmarked $1 million for her son, Jack, but she's concerned about Jack's soon-to-be ex-wife. Jane doesn't want her to have access to Jack's inheritance. Complicating the situation is the fact that Jack gambles, and Jane wants to safeguard this money from potential creditors.

Jane transfers $1 million to an irrevocable trust for Jack. Since the trust owns the assets, Jane believes neither Jack's ex-spouse nor his creditors will have access to the money.

Here, the court must determine whether the trust assets can be considered in the division of assets in the divorce. Several creditors also want access to the assets. So, who has a right to the money?

Jane. From Jane's perspective, neither Jack's soon-to-be ex-spouse nor his creditors are entitled to the money.

  1. This was her money, which she put to work for a specific purpose.
  2. Jane put the money in a trust, rather than giving it directly to Jack.
  3. The assets were never in Jack's possession, so they should not be considered his property for purposes of divorce or debt

Divorcing spouse. The divorcing spouse also has a compelling argument for why the assets should be considered.

  1. If the money in trust is the only substantial marital asset, she might argue that it's fair and equitable to consider this money in the divorce.
  2. She could also argue that Jack's rights under the trust should bring the assets into consideration.

Creditors. Here, the argument focuses on control and access.

  1. Jack's right to demand property at certain intervals may be strong enough, in the court's view, to merit inclusion.
  2. If mandatory income provisions force the trustee to distribute income to Jack, little creditor protection may be afforded.
  3. Creditors can argue that powers of appointment strengthen Jack's ownership interest to a level that makes trust assets reachable.

Safeguarding the Assets

Given these arguments, how can a grantor mitigate the risk that unwanted parties will gain access to irrevocable trust assets? Ultimately, protecting those assets is the estate planning attorney's responsibility. But your clients' knowledge of the following provisions may help protect the assets they hope to transfer to heirs.

Powers of appointment. These provisions allow the beneficiary to name new beneficiaries to his or her share of the assets. In general, the greater the powers of appointment, the higher the risk that trust assets will be exposed.

  1. Powers of appointment can potentially expose trust assets to a divorce proceeding or creditors.
  2. The courts differ in how they view this issue, so it is an important factor in trust design.

Beneficiary as trustee. It's not uncommon for a grantor to name the beneficiary as the trustee. By doing so, assets become vulnerable to divorce agreements and debt settlements.

  1. If the trustee has discretion to make distributions to the beneficiary (himself or herself), it could be difficult to argue that this is not outright ownership.
  2. If the intention of the trust is to create a platform for asset management, naming the beneficiary as trustee may make sense.
  3. The grantor should understand that this structure is almost certain to expose trust assets to the same risks as those to the beneficiary's personal property.

Control. In Caruso v. Caruso, the beneficiary's relationship to his trustee (the beneficiary's accountant) was considered.

  1. The trustee had full discretionary power to distribute assets to the beneficiary.
  2. The beneficiary—who had no powers under the trust—argued that trust assets should not be considered in his divorce.
  3. The court determined that the accountant was the beneficiary's "yes man" and was too close to exercise independent judgment.

The relationship between the trustee and beneficiary can be a weak point. Often, a family member or friend is chosen. But if this person is too close to the beneficiary or will have trouble acting independently, he or she may not be the best choice.

Mandatory income. There are infinite ways to write a trust, depending on the grantor's goals.

  1. Trusts often include a mandatory provision directing the trustee to pay income and/or principal to the beneficiary.
  2. In some cases, trustees have discretion to distribute income and principal according to the ascertainable standard (health, education, maintenance, and expenses).

Some state courts have considered the mandatory income payment as a marital asset, while others have not. If asset protection is a concern, the grantor should consider whether a mandatory income option is the best choice. Giving the trustee discretionary power to distribute income and principal may be a better option for asset protection.

Know the Risks

Although as a financial advisor you must be careful not to give your clients legal or tax advice regarding their estate plans, you can help them prepare for conversations with their attorneys. Most attorneys don't understand a client's full financial situation, but by by combining your collective expertise, you can help your clients achieve their estate planning goals and transfer their wealth as desired.

Our Estate Planning Blueprint for Financial Advisors can help you position yourself as one of your clients' most trusted and essential family wealth advisors.

This post originally appeared on Commonwealth Independent Advisor, a blog authored by subject-matter experts at Commonwealth Financial Network®, the nation's largest privately held RIA–independent broker/dealer. To subscribe, please visit https://blog.commonwealth.com.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Upcoming Event

Nov 13

Conference

Best Practices Workshop

For the sixth year, InvestmentNews will host the Best Practices Workshop & Awards, bringing together the industry’s top-performing and most influential firms in one room for a full-day. This exclusive workshop and awards program for the... Learn more

Featured video

Events

How would your client service change if you had one client?

Too often, advisers are focused on scale and growth instead of their clients. Adviser Barry Glassman explains what advisers can do to stand out in a crowded industry.

Latest news & opinion

Step one: Withdraw from the broker protocol

Pulling out of the protocol proved to be one part of multipronged strategies by Morgan Stanley and UBS to reduce broker attrition. So far, their plans seem to be working.

11 best islands in the world to retire to

International Living has come up with a list of affordable islands around the world.

SEC tests show investors don't understand disclosure form for brokers, advisers

Investor advocates: Agency still has a lot of work to do on Form CRS

Wells Fargo considering sale of retirement-plan unit

The business could fetch as much as $1 billion, sources say.

Employees can now save in a 401(k) by using a credit card

EvoShare provides workers with credit-card perks in the form of contributions to a retirement plan.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print