CEO in Woodbridge Ponzi scheme fined $120 million by SEC

Robert Shapiro is settling claims he defrauded investors in a $1.2 billion real estate Ponzi

Nov 1, 2018 @ 4:41 pm

By Bloomberg News

Robert Shapiro, the former chief executive officer of Woodbridge Group of Companies, agreed to pay $120 million to the Securities and Exchange Commission to settle allegations he defrauded investors in a $1.2 billion real estate Ponzi scheme that drove his company into bankruptcy, according to court papers. Mr. Shapiro didn't admit or deny the allegations.

Mr. Shapiro promised returns of as high as 10% from investments in developers who flipped luxury real estate but instead their cash flowed into a web of related companies that Mr. Shapiro controlled, the SEC said. He then used money from new investors to repay earlier ones and spent at least $21 million to charter planes, pay country club fees and buy luxury items, according to the agency's filing.

Mr. Shapiro, his wife Jeri, and the various Shapiro-owned entities named as defendants in the SEC suit are together responsible for paying $892 million to the commission, according to the documents filed Oct. 25 in federal court in Miami. The fines will go into a "fair fund" which will be used to compensate the victims of the Ponzi scheme, the documents said.

Ryan O'Quinn from DLA Piper, an attorney for Mr. Shapiro, didn't immediately respond to a request for comment on the settlement. Representatives for the SEC declined to comment.

Woodbridge, which has been working its way through Delaware bankruptcy court, received approval Oct. 29 to go forward with the liquidation plan for its remaining assets. The bankruptcy court found sufficient evidence to show that the debtors operated as a Ponzi scheme and the proposed settlements are fair and in the best interests of the various creditor groups. The settlement is subject to District Court approval.

The bankruptcy case is: Woodbridge Group of Cos., 17-12560, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware. The District Court case is: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Shapiro, 17-24624, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video


These are the federal and state rules that will most impact 401(k) advisers

Will Hansen, chief governmental affairs officer for the National Association of Plan Advisors, discusses regulation and legislation poised to have the biggest impact on advisers.

Latest news & opinion

IBDs with the most CFPs

How many of the more than 83,000 certified financial planners are employed by the big independent broker-dealers?

Richard Thaler wants to use 401(k)s to boost Social Security payments

The Nobel laureate wants to simplify drawing down retirement assets, which he thinks is 'way harder' than saving the money.

InvestmentNews announces 2019 Innovation Awards winners

Sheryl Garrett is this year's InvestmentNews Icon.

Morgan Stanley rides wealth management train to solid first quarter

Chairman and CEO James Gorman expresses excitement about expanding into workplace plans with purchase of Solium.

Fate of New Jersey fiduciary standard could come down to politics, court

With strong support from N.J. Gov. Phil Murphy, the proposal has momentum out of the gate.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print