D.A. Davidson is latest broker-dealer snagged for overly expensive fund shares

Firm will repay $447,000 to clients it overcharged for more than seven years

Nov 1, 2018 @ 1:58 pm

By Bruce Kelly

D.A. Davidson & Co. is the latest in a long line of brokerage firms to be flagged by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. for not giving certain clients discounts when they bought mutual fund A shares. On Tuesday, Finra said it had reached a settlement with D.A. Davidson in which the firm will repay $447,000 to clients it overcharged between January 2011 and April 2018.

D.A. Davidson, which currently has 1,033 registered reps and advisers, over that period "disadvantaged certain retirement plan and charitable organization customers that were eligible to purchase class A shares in certain mutual funds without a front-end sales charge," according to the Finra settlement. The eligible customers instead were sold Class A shares with a front-end commission or Class B or C shares with back-end charges and higher ongoing fees and expenses.

Over this time, the firm failed to put in place and maintain supervisory systems and procedures designed to ensure that eligible clients received the benefit of the appropriate discounts, according to Finra.

D.A. Davidson agreed to the settlement without admitting to or denying Finra's findings. The firm was censured by Finra but not fined.

A spokesman for the firm, Ulric Kelly, did not comment.

Securities regulators recently have been focusing on whether broker-dealers and registered investment advisers give the proper discounts to clients who buy mutual fund A shares. Most recently, in September, Finra said Lincoln Investment Planning would pay $1.37 million to clients whom it overcharged from January 2011 to this June.

In February, the Securities and Exchange Commission launched an initiative to waive fines if investment advisers come forward and admit that they put clients into high-fee mutual fund classes and agree to reimburse those clients.

And in December, in Finra's summary of 2017 exam findings, the regulator noted its concern about brokers recommending high-fee share classes without determining whether they're suitable for their clients.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video


Regulators' gloves are coming off with cybersecurity. Put up your dukes with these tips

Updated guidelines and some of the first-ever rule enforcements signal that regulators are getting serious about holding firms accountable for data breaches, according to special projects editor Liz Skinner and technology reporter Ryan Neal.

Recommended Video

Keys to a successful deal

Latest news & opinion

Finra focuses exam priorities on investor-protection threats

Online distribution of private placements pops up; exchange-traded products cause suitability worries.

10 public companies that boosted their ESG ratings in 2018

These 10 companies increased their environmental, social and governance scores last year.

Blackrock exposed data on 12,000 financial advisers

The data appeared in three spreadsheets, linked on one of the New York-based company's web pages dedicated to its iShares exchange-traded funds

Advisers throw cold water on FIRE movement

Millennials love it, advisers don't: Turns out, extreme early retirement is a suitable goal for almost nobody.

10 universities with the most billionaire alumni

These 10 American schools have the greatest number of alumni who are billionaires.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print