Bounded rationality: The realistic choice

Nov 5, 2018 @ 12:01 am

By The American College of Financial Services

Making a sandwich is easy. Making a perfect sandwich? Not so much. Standard economics assumes people make rational, utility-maximizing, optimal choices. But, how can we reconcile the belief that humans make rational choices when there are countless examples of when they do just the opposite?

One could argue that most choices do not come from perfect rationality, but rather from bounded rationality. In this post, you will learn about bounded rationality and how advisers and wealth managers can use the knowledge of its existence to their advantage.

Suboptimal sandwiches

The bounded rationality argument goes like this: People are rational, utility-maximizing, optimizers. However, they have limits. Sometimes they lack information. Sometimes they don't have the time to figure out the perfect answer. Sometimes, even if they took the time, cognitive limitations make it difficult to find the perfect answer. In other words, the bounded rationality argument says that people make the best choices given their imperfect and limited tools and resources.

Consider a simple example to illustrate the differences:

Suppose you want to make a peanut butter and jelly sandwich, so you go to the grocery store to buy peanut butter, jelly and bread. Assume there is, in the store, a perfect, utility-maximizing combination of peanut butter, jelly and bread, taking into account the cost and quality of each element and their combinations.

Will you make this perfect choice? Standard economics says, “Yes. You are a rational, utility-maximizing machine, and therefore you will make the best choice.” Except, this standard economic approach requires some assumptions. It assumes you have full external knowledge regarding every type of peanut butter, jelly and bread sold by the store.

The standard economic approach also assumes you have full internal knowledge. Crunchy versus smooth. Grape versus strawberry. White versus whole wheat. You know your exact preference rating for each food item. You know the order of this ranking, as well as the difference in experience between each and the financial value of the difference in experience. Finally, the standard economic approach assumes you will devote all the time and cognitive effort needed to select the optimal choice.

Bounded rationality as a solution

Bounded rationality gets rid of these unrealistic assumptions. Bounded rationality says you don't know everything about every product. And, if you spent all day just to think through all the financial, health and taste outcomes of your choice, you would be wasting an enormous amount of valuable time and effort. So, instead, bounded rationality says you make an optimal choice given your limited time, effort and information. Will you pick the perfect combination? Probably not. But, in this case, getting to perfection doesn't make sense because of the time and effort that would be required.

What does this have to do with managing wealth for individuals?

The same shortcuts that people use to choose peanut butter, they may also use to choose wealth managers or portfolio options. As an expert, you know a good deal about alpha, beta and important technical aspects of investment management. It's central to your task to build technically competent, optimizing portfolios.

But, is this enough to attract and retain clients? Bounded rationality suggests it may not be. It may not make sense for the client to become an expert on portfolio management, or even to develop enough expertise to understand the technical advantages of your approach. Instead, a client might use heuristics to determine quality by inquiring into the following:

  1. Who else uses you as a wealth manager?
  2. What designations of expertise do you have?
  3. Does your dress, your office and your communications convey success, seriousness and competence?

As a purely rational matter, we know that it's possible to have all of these things and still make technically inappropriate wealth management decisions. But, if we recognize that human decisions are not purely rational but are only boundedly rational, we can begin to appreciate how important these heuristic signs and signals are to the financial decision-making process.

Investing in education is the rational choice for advisers

In a recent study, it was found that consumers who valued designations, as well as those with higher incomes and investable assets, paid advisers more than those who did not. That being said, becoming a more educated and effective wealth manager is the best way to better serve your clientele and grow in your profession. The research is in, and, one might say, the choice is as simple as making a PB&J.

An expert team of investment researchers from The American College of Financial Services created the award-winning Wealth Management Certified Professional (WMCP) designation in order to serve a marketplace where individuals seek advisers with a true understanding of their unique needs and goals. Advisers with the WMCP designation have deep knowledge of personal wealth and investment management, including portfolio theory, behavioral finance, mastery of investment tools and advanced wealth management strategies.

This article was adapted from the behavioral finance curriculum in the Wealth Management Certified Professional (WMCP) education program developed by The American College of Financial Services.


What do you think?

View comments

Upcoming event

Oct 22


San Francisco Women Adviser Summit

The InvestmentNews Women Adviser Summit, a one-day workshop now held in six cities due to popular demand, is uniquely designed for the sophisticated female adviser who wants to take her personal and professional self to the next level.... Learn more

Most watched


Schwab's Jeff Kleintop: Prep for volatility given China trade uncertainties

China could be considered a developed market in five to seven years , according to Jeff Kleintop, chief global investment strategist, Charles Schwab.


Young advisers envision a radically different business in five years

Fintech and sustainable investing are two factors being watched closely by some of the 2019 class of InvestmentNews' 40 Under 40.

Latest news & opinion

TIAA exits the life insurance business

The move is a big deal for RIAs, experts say, since TIAA was one of only a few insurers to offer fee-only life policies.

Advisers step up efforts to help clients manage student loan debt

As some Democrats campaign to wipe the slate clean, financial planners focus on limiting the amount students borrow.

Funding for Reg BI, other SEC advice reform efforts denied in Waters amendment

House likely to approve measure that effectively kills rule package, but it faces uphill battle in Senate

Wall Street lashes out at Sanders' plan to pay off student debt with a securities trading tax

Financial pros argue that a transaction levy will hurt mom-and-pop investors along with investment houses.

GPB paid B-Ds and reps steep commissions to sell troubled private placements

GPB paid commissions of 9.3%, or $167 million altogether, on the firm's private placements.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print