BB&T settles 401(k) lawsuit for $24 million

The settlement is one of the largest for a financial firm accused of self-dealing in its company 401(k) plan

Dec 4, 2018 @ 2:13 pm

By Greg Iacurci

Branch Banking and Trust Co. will pay $24 million to settle a lawsuit alleging it profited from its 401(k) plan at the expense of its employees, one of the largest settlements to date reached by a financial firm involved in such litigation.

The lawsuit, Sims et al v. BB&T Corp. et al, alleged the firm breached its fiduciary duties by causing its 401(k) plan to pay unreasonable investment management and administrative fees, among other charges, constituting self-dealing and imprudent decision-making. BB&T was the plan record keeper, custodian and investment manager in addition to being the plan sponsor.

The settlement, filed Nov. 30, must be approved a by a judge. It covers participants in the company retirement plan from Sept. 4, 2009 to Oct. 25, 2018.

"We are pleased to have resolved the claims involving supervision of our 401(k) plan, and believe a voluntary settlement is the best way for all parties to move forward, avoid a costly trial and further extend an already lengthy litigation process," said BB&T spokesman David White.

The BB&T case was filed in September 2015 in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina.

Lawsuits targeting plan sponsors over 401(k) plan management began to appear en masse around 12 years ago, and have picked up steam over the past several years. Financial firms, especially investment managers with an active-management bent, have emerged as a subset of defendants.

Several have settled within the past few months: Waddell & Reed Financial Inc. and Jackson National Life Insurance Co. in November for $4.9 million and $4.5 million, respectively, and Citigroup Inc. in August for $6.9 million. Deutsche Bank also settled in August for $21.9 million, one of the largest recent settlements in these cases.

Other firms to have reached heftier settlements in recent years include American Airlines Inc. (which formerly owned an affiliated investment manager), Ameriprise Financial Inc. and Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co., which respectively paid $22 million, $27.5 million and $31 million.

Courts have found in favor of some defendants, including Capital Group, Putnam Investments and Wells Fargo & Co.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video


Why advisers are pessimistic about the economy

Deputy editor Bob Hordt and senior research analyst Matt Sirinides discuss a recent InvestmentNews survey of advisers, most of whom see a recession ahead before the next presidential election.

Recommended Video

Keys to a successful deal

Latest news & opinion

Finra focuses exam priorities on investor-protection threats

Online distribution of private placements pops up; exchange-traded products cause suitability worries.

10 public companies that boosted their ESG ratings in 2018

These 10 companies increased their environmental, social and governance scores last year.

Blackrock exposed data on 12,000 financial advisers

The data appeared in three spreadsheets, linked on one of the New York-based company's web pages dedicated to its iShares exchange-traded funds

Advisers throw cold water on FIRE movement

Millennials love it, advisers don't: Turns out, extreme early retirement is a suitable goal for almost nobody.

10 universities with the most billionaire alumni

These 10 American schools have the greatest number of alumni who are billionaires.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print