San Francisco advisers cheated low-income housing: City attorney

The married couple, Caroline Novak and Igor Lotsvin, run Sage Rhino Capital, an RIA

Dec 11, 2018 @ 2:14 pm

By Bruce Kelly

The city of San Francisco has sued two financial advisers, a married couple, after one allegedly lied to obtain an affordable housing condominium in the city almost two decades ago.

The lawsuit against Caroline Novak and Igor Lotsvin was filed last Thursday in San Francisco Superior Court.

The two advisers are listed as managing members of an RIA called Sage Rhino Capital, according to the firm's Form ADV.

Messages left at Sage Rhino Capital for Ms. Novak and Mr. Lotsvin were not returned. According to its Form ADV, the firm has 113 high-net-worth clients and $381.9 million in assets under management.

Both advisers were registered with Merrill Lynch until December 2017. According to their BrokerCheck reports, both resigned from Merrill Lynch at that time for allegedly failing to disclose an outside business activity.

The complaint details how Ms. Novak lied on her initial application in 1999 to obtain a below-market condominium and continued to break the law, according to a statement by the San Francisco Attorney's office, which recently has been investigating affordable-housing fraud.

Ms. Novak bought the unit as part of a local affordable-housing program, which requires developers to set aside a certain number of units for low- or middle-income households, according to the San Francisco Attorney's office.

According to the complaint, Ms. Novak falsely stated on her application that she did not already own real property, when in fact she did — a house in nearby San Mateo. Owning property disqualified Ms. Novak from the program.

Over the years, Ms. Novak and her husband, Mr. Lotsvin, illegally rented the apartment that Ms. Novak paid $178,500 for, according to the complaint. The apartment was also allegedly used as security for over $1.5 million in loans and lines of credit, according to the complaint.

Since 2015, the two allegedly kept their unit, in violation of program rules, while they lived elsewhere, in a $2.8 million home in the San Francisco suburbs, according to the complaint.

San Francisco City Attorney Dennis Herrera is seeking a court order preventing the couple from owning the unit in violation of the law and requiring them to sell the property to a new, qualified low-income owner.


What do you think?

View comments

Most watched


Young advisers envision a radically different business in five years

Fintech and sustainable investing are two factors being watched closely by some of the 2019 class of InvestmentNews' 40 Under 40.


Young professionals see lots of opportunity to reinvent the advice experience

Members of the 2019 InvestmentNews class of 40 Under 40 have strategies to overcome the challenges of being young in a mature industry.

Latest news & opinion

Target-date fund design may be wrong for retirees

Researchers suggest the funds don't adequately hedge against sequence-of-returns risk in retirement.

InvestmentNews' 2019 class of 40 Under 40

Our 40 Under 40 project, now in its sixth year, highlights young talent in the financial advice industry. These individuals illustrate the tremendous potential of those coming up in the profession. These stories will surprise, entertain, educate and inspire.

New Jersey fiduciary rule: Pressure leads to public hearing, comment deadline extension

Industry push results in chance to air grievances on July 17 and another month to present objections.

Galvin to propose fiduciary rule for Massachusetts brokers

The secretary of the commonwealth is proposing a fiduciary standard in response to an SEC investment-advice rule he views as too weak.

Summer reading recommendations from financial advisers

Here are some books that will keep you informed and entertained during summer's downtime


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print