Finra fines Merrill $300,000 for failing to supervise rogue broker

The ghost of Eva Weinberg's actions continue to haunt the wirehouse

Dec 14, 2018 @ 1:45 pm

By Jeff Benjamin

Finra has fined Merrill Lynch $300,000 for failing to supervise the actions of rogue broker Eva Weinberg, who was employed by the wirehouse for one year in 2010.

The fine is part of the lingering ripple effect of a series of court battles that have gone on since 2012 involving Ms. Weinberg, who is serving time in prison after pleading guilty to defrauding former professional football player Dwight Freeney after she stopped working for Merrill.

According to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc., Merrill agreed on Dec. 13 to the censure and fine for failing to properly investigate and supervise Ms. Weinberg regarding three emails that were flagged internally by Merrill and a $1.7 million default judgement entered against Ms. Weinberg based on a civil complaint.

Merrill Lynch declined to comment for this story.

According to BrokerCheck, Ms. Weinberg worked in the brokerage industry from 1988 through 2004, after which she went to work for a real estate company owned by Michael Stern.

Mr. Stern, who is also in prison related to the defrauding of Mr. Sweeny, is cited by Finra as an example of Merrill's lax oversight of Mr. Weinberg.

According to Finra, Mr. Stern had a criminal history and by March 2009 when his business went bankrupt, had been the subject of several news articles in the Miami media that had detailed his alleged involvement in bribing public officials in connection with some of his real estate projects.

When Ms. Weinberg applied to work as an investment associate for Merrill Lynch in February 2009, she initially omitted her five-year employment with Mr. Stern.

According to Finra, Ms. Weinberg worked in Merrill's Miami office on a team focused on working with professional athletes. She was introduced to Mr. Freeney in February 2010, and shortly thereafter introduced the athlete to Mr. Stern, under a fictitious name and falsely representing Mr. Stern as a "wealthy and successful business man who could help (Mr. Freeney) with his various, existing business and other financial needs."

Finra describes Mr. Stern as a "con man who together with [Ms. Weinberg] gained [Mr. Freeney's] confidence and then access to his financial accounts, ultimately misappropriating millions of dollars" after Ms. Weinberg left Merrill Lynch in July 2010.

Mr. Freeney eventually sued Bank of America and Merrill Lynch for $20 million, and ultimately settled for $13 million.

"Brokerage firms must supervise their brokers, because when they get even the slightest whiff of impropriety, they are duty bound to look into it," said securities lawyer Adam Gana, who was not involved in the lawsuit.

"In this case, Merrill did not do what it is required to do when faced with a number of red flags," he added.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

B-D Data Center

Use InvestmentNews' B-D Data Center to find exclusive information and intelligence about the independent broker-dealer industry.

Rank Broker-dealers by

Featured video

INTV

Why millennial demand for ESG is falling on deaf ears

Editorial director Fred Gabriel and senior columnist Jeff Benjamin say there's a disconnect between the big appetite for environmental, social and governance funds in 401(k) plans and their offering.

Latest news & opinion

ESG options scarce in 401(k) plans

There's growing interest among plan participants, but reluctance to add funds that take into account environmental, social and governance factors persists.

Envestnet acquires MoneyGuide for $500 million

Deal will allow Envestnet to deepen integrations between MoneyGuide and its other wealth management solutions.

Genworth move could signal big shift in distribution of long-term-care insurance

Insurers may turn to direct-to-consumer sales only, bypassing brokers and insurance agents.

Morgan Stanley threatens to pull out of Nevada over state's fiduciary rule

Wirehouse says it would not be able to work there under state's current proposal.

Advisers see college admissions scandal as tip of the iceberg

Parents' conduct is described as 'disgusting' but not surprising given the current state of higher education.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print