Advisory fees push commissions further into the background

Fee-based advice is not perfect, but most clients prefer it over a commission-based option

Feb 19, 2019 @ 2:35 pm

By Jeff Benjamin

When there's a financial professional in the picture, investors mostly prefer paying fees based on assets under management.

The latest research from Cerulli Associates found that clients seeking investment advice from financial professionals have largely warmed to the idea of their adviser joining them on the side of the table that benefits when portfolios rise and suffers when portfolio balances fall.

Cerulli's survey of more than 8,000 investors with at least $250,000 worth of investible assets shows that 61% of clients prefer paying fees based on assets under management in adviser-directed accounts, while 13% of clients prefer commission-based fees.

Retainer fees were preferred by 22% of clients, and 4% preferred paying fees by the hour.

On the other end of the spectrum, 56% of self-directed investors prefer to pay commissions, which compares to the 16% of self-directed investors who would prefer paying a fee pegged to the size of their portfolio.

Cerulli director Scott Smith said the research found that investors' appreciation for asset-based fees increased in relative proportion to an adviser's involvement in managing the portfolio.

In relationships identified as adviser-assisted, 47% of clients said they preferred asset-based fees, 23% preferred retainer fees, and 4% wanted hourly fees.

But 26% opted for commission-based fees in adviser-assisted relationships when the client has the final say on investment decisions.

"Investors who regularly work with advisers are more likely to indicate a preference for asset-based, retainer or hourly fees," Mr. Smith said.

Fee models have long been among the most sensitive issues for financial planners, who continue to wrestle with the topic as the planning profession evolves.

According to Cerulli, the percentage of fee-based assets across all advisory channels increased from 26% in 2008 to 45% at the end of 2017, and the research suggests that trend will continue "as providers increasingly position themselves as clients' partners in pursuit of long-term goals rather than transaction facilitators."

But just as some advisers are getting comfortable making the case for asset-based pricing, the industry is evolving toward models that take the emphasis off asset management.

Eliza De Pardo, a management consultant for TD Ameritrade Institutional, estimates that 98% of all advisory clients are charged under a pure asset-based pricing model, and 80% of all advisory firms include in those fees services other than asset management.

The Cerulli data and the TD data are not comparable, because the TD data is looking at advisory firms that rarely charge commissions.

But the evolution of fee models is present in both sets of research.

Ms. De Pardo's message was that using fees tied to assets under management can make it difficult for an advisory firm to separate and distinguish all the other services it provides beyond asset management. It can also make it more difficult to raise fees, especially during periods when markets are declining, she added.

The other downside of asset-based pricing is that it limits the market of potential clients to those who already have a lot of money that needs managing.

For that reason, Ms. De Pardo suggests advisory firms experiment with multiple fee models, which might include hourly, or flat fees, to set up a plan for younger clients who might have more debt than assets, but still appreciate quality financial advice.

Mr. Smith agrees that fees need to continue to evolve. But, particularly at the wirehouses, where there is still a strong commission-based environment, he said that evolution will take time.

"There is more traction for hourly and retainer fees with advisers and clients who are under age 40 and are already used to paying monthly fees for other types of services," he said. "But switching right over from commissions to retainer fees is like teaching an old horse a new trick and then making him dance."


What do you think?

View comments

Upcoming event

Nov 13


Top Advisory Firm Summit

Formerly known as the Best Practices Workshop, this new one-day conference will also include content from the Best Places to Work event!The Top Advisory Firm Summit will provide CEOs, COOs, CTOs, CMOs, and Managing Partners from the... Learn more

Most watched


Young professionals see lots of opportunity to reinvent the advice experience

Members of the 2019 InvestmentNews class of 40 Under 40 have strategies to overcome the challenges of being young in a mature industry.


Young advisers envision a radically different business in five years

Fintech and sustainable investing are two factors being watched closely by some of the 2019 class of InvestmentNews' 40 Under 40.

Latest news & opinion

GPB paid B-Ds and reps steep commissions to sell troubled private placements

GPB paid commissions of 9.3%, or $167 million altogether, on the firm's private placements.

Give us a break, active managers say

Seven portfolio managers share their outlooks for the rest of the year, generally agreeing that it's been hard for active managers to stand out.

GPB Capital reports decline in value of two biggest funds

One has dropped by 25.4% and the other by 39%, according to the company.

6 ways Social Security will change in 2020

As the enormous baby boomer generation continues to march toward retirement, they are straining the resources of Social Security. Here are six ways that the nation’s primary retirement income program will change in 2020.

SEC clears up confusion over whether advisers can continue to call themselves fiduciaries

Despite an agency directive to eliminate the word 'fiduciary' in Form CRS, SEC officials say it's OK to use it.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print