Subscribe

What 401(k) record-keeper consolidation means to retirement plan advisers

Advisers will have to make some tough calls — for clients and for themselves

The recent report that Principal Financial is likely buying Wells Fargo’s retirement record-keeping division could be a harbinger of massive 401(k) record-keeper consolidation that puts even more assets and participants in the hands of fewer providers. What does that mean for plan advisers, and what can they do to prepare?

Though the number of 401(k) record keepers has been significantly reduced since the 2008-09 recession, there are still almost 40 national providers — most of which service small to midsize plans, and more than 500 regional record-keeping third-party administrators. No established financial services company has created a new provider in decades, but robo-record keepers such as Betterment for Business are popping up.

(More: Cybersecurity poses strain between plan sponsors, record keepers)

The cost to maintain a giant record-keeping system is growing, driven in part by cybersecurity concerns, old technology that’s in constant need of repair, and the demand for new features and clean data. Broker-dealers, specialty registered investment advisers and elite advisers are asking for more support from service providers. Asset managers’ funding is shrinking, with some making big bets on just a few providers, leaving less for the rest.

It’s entirely possibly that in three to five years, there could be as few as five to seven major platforms that dwarf the rest of the market — plus the two big payroll providers, Paychex and ADP. Already a top retail 401(k) record keeper, Principal will become that much bigger and more formidable if it adds another 4 million Wells Fargo participants. Fidelity Investments, Empower Retirement and Vanguard Group (especially with its Ascensus partnership for small-market 401(k) plans) are already well-positioned, with Voya Financial not far behind.

It will be difficult, if not impossible, for the next tier of providers to grow organically fast enough to compete with these five, so they must either eventually acquire or sell.

So what does all this mean to plan advisers and their clients? Top-tier providers will be less likely to share participant data with advisers. Asset managers’ support for advisers will be limited as larger record-keeping platforms demand more, perhaps in the form of larger fees for shelf space. And with fewer options, there could be less pressure to innovate and higher pricing, similar to the dynamic when one airline owns a particular route.

In addition, these larger record keepers might be tempted to distribute directly rather than through advisers — especially in the smaller market, if open multiple employer plans are legalized.

On the other hand, advisers who are unable or unwilling to consolidate their roster of record keepers will have it done for them, which will make service and due diligence more efficient. The more plans advisers have with a record keeper, the more power they have, resulting in higher levels of integrated service. These “super” platforms will have more capital to support new technology like blockchain and fuel artificial intelligence through big, clean data.

At a minimum, plan advisers have to start making tough calls for clients, and themselves, about which providers are likely to exit the 401(k) market or risk being left flat-footed, as was the case when The Hartford announced that it was selling its business in 2009. Though the developments may not be the advisers’ fault, it will be their problem.

(More:401(k) record keepers competing with advisers on financial wellness)

Plan sponsors may not be happy, especially if their adviser had recently recommended using the record keeper now selling its business. And advisers with big 401(k) books with that provider will spend way too much time fending off hungry competitors calling their clients. Tough situation. But doing nothing in the face of inevitable, and perhaps massive, retail 401(k) record-keeper consolidation will be tougher.

Fred Barstein is founder and CEO of The Retirement Advisor University and The Plan Sponsor University. He is also a contributing editor for InvestmentNewsRetirement Plan Adviser newsletter.

Related Topics: ,

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Covid, convergence, consolidation and the 2021 RPA roundtables

Aggregators realize that in-plan retirement income solutions are needed, while CIOs understand that advisers need to be able to help participants navigate the myriad of benefits offered at work.

Chief investment officers critical to success of DC plans, participants

CIOs from the leading DC record keepers, aggregators and broker-dealers discussed their greatest opportunities and challenges.

RPAs need a new name to reach the next level

While 'retirement plan adviser' has been a good description of those who serve ERISA retirement plans, it's actually quite limiting to focus on the plan, rather than the participant.

Who will win the 401(k) battle in the 2020s?

The start of the 2020s has been dominated by the three Cs — Covid, convergence and consolidation. Government mandates could cause the small and startup plan market to explode, and RPA consolidation has blown up.

RPA aggregators focused on convergence, consolidation and cooperation

Unlike any other industry event, the RPA Aggregator event had no agenda. All participants were focused on the defined-contribution industry’s biggest opportunities and challenges.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print