Subscribe

Latest price-war salvo pegs fees to low-risk performance

Dallas-based asset manager road tests a fee model that might be too complex for some investors to grasp.

Westwood Holdings Group, a $16.6 billion Dallas-based asset manager, is hoping to catch a ride on the price-war bandwagon with a managed-account fee model that links fees to the risk taken by the portfolio manager.

To underscore the lack of value in simple market beta, the Westwood pricing model, which is being applied initially to a concentrated large-cap strategy, will only apply fees to risk-adjusted performance that exceeds the performance of the benchmark.

The ultimate fee, which is capped at 1.25%, will be applied to the 60% to 80% of the performance that the investor retains. Like some alternative investments, Westwood will benefit by keeping 20% to 40% of the portfolio gains.

“It starts with a flat, zero fee and you only pay when we outperform,” said Phil DeSantis, Westwood senior vice president and head of product management.

The strategy is initially available only to institutional investors, clients working with financial advisers and accredited investors.

The fees are designed to be risk-based, which Mr. DeSantis argued will prevent a manager from pushing the limits of risk to generate a higher fee.

“It measures the level of outperformance and the risk being taken to generate that outperformance,” he said. “It prevents managers from gaming fees by taking risks.”

While there have been efforts across the mutual fund industry to charge variable fulcrum fees that adjust as performance climbs, Mr. DeSantis said it has never been done by factoring in the amount of risk taken to generate the performance.

Todd Rosenbluth, director of mutual fund and ETF research at CFRA, said one challenge the Westwood model might encounter if it reaches the mutual fund level is getting investors to understand and embrace the complexity.

“It’s not a gimmick, but it is a way to get investors to pay attention to your fund,” he said. “Investors search for funds based on expense ratios and performance, and even though there is a pull toward less expensive products, I think fluctuating fees are harder to explain.”

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Are AUM fees heading toward extinction?

The asset-based model is the default setting for many firms, but more creative thinking is needed to attract the next generation of clients.

Advisors tilt toward ETFs, growth stocks and investment-grade bonds: Fidelity

Advisors hail traditional benefits of ETFs while trend toward aggressive equity exposure shows how 'soft landing has replaced recession.'

Chasing retirement plan prospects with a minority business owner connection

Martin Smith blends his advisory niche with an old-school method of rolling up his sleeves and making lots of cold calls.

Inflation data fuel markets but economists remain cautious

PCE inflation data is at its lowest level in two years, but is that enough to stop the Fed from raising interest rates?

Advisors roll with the Fed’s well-telegraphed monetary policy move

The June pause in the rate-hike cycle has introduced the possibility of another pause in September, but most advisors see rates higher for longer.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print