by Sabrina Willmer
The lobbying powerhouse for the US private equity industry has thrown its weight behind a controversial bill to overhaul Delaware’s corporate laws, which could make it harder for shareholders to beat companies and executives in court — a long-simmering campaign reignited by Elon Musk.
A team of five lobbyists hired by the American Investment Council, which is funded by the likes of Blackstone Inc. and KKR & Co., has been pressing lawmakers to support the bill. If passed into law, the “billionaires’ bill,” as some detractors call it, would lower the standards for insider deals involving controlling shareholders and for rich compensation packages for founders like Musk. An army of professional influencers has been “swarming the statehouse,” as one legislator put it.
The bill passed the state House of Representatives on Tuesday evening and is on its way to be signed into law. The legislation comes after growing criticism that the state’s corporate law has become obstructive. But the effort gained new urgency when Musk, the world’s richest person, gave Delaware a scare by reincorporating his companies in Texas and Nevada. He acted after the Chancery Court’s chief judge shot down his Tesla Inc. pay package, the largest ever awarded to a business leader.
Private equity firms have a big stake in Senate Bill 21 because they often retain a significant holding in companies after listing them through initial public offerings, exposing them to potential shareholder lawsuits that can drag on fund returns. Among the PE players, the biggest firms have the most to gain from the bill, since it may help contain shareholder suits in take-private or take-public transactions, said Bill O’Neil, a partner at Winston & Strawn who advises corporations and private equity firms.
“There is no bad news here for private equity,” O’Neil said.
Critics of SB 21, including public pension funds and shareholder advocacy groups, say fears of a corporate exodus are overblown and have been conjured up to push through a giveaway to billionaires and powerful corporate insiders at the expense of smaller stockholders.
“The lobbying over this bill is getting intense,” Delaware Representative Sophie Phillips, a Democrat who opposes the bill, said before the House vote. “Lobbyists for both sides have been swarming the statehouse. This is the most intense lobbying I’ve ever seen on a single piece of legislation.”
Phillips said she’s concerned that advocates for a less intrusive body of corporate law are going too far in loosening the reins on controlling shareholders and will make Chancery Court unfriendly to shareholders seeking to rectify corporate wrongs.
The legislation defines that control with specific parameters, which could make it harder for an investor to show that an influential founder, for example, owed shareholders a fiduciary duty in vetting an acquisition or pay package. It also strengthens the presumption of director independence so it can’t be as readily called into question by shareholders who don’t like such a deal. And it cuts down on the range of records smaller shareholders can access in building a case.
The bill, which advanced out of the state Senate on a 20-0 vote, passed the state House of Representatives 32-7.
The private equity industry, like others, has fired a warning shot: It could be part of a wave of companies that might leave Delaware, unhappy with court rulings against controlling shareholders.
The bill provides “needed predictability” to Delaware law as private equity firms have been considering “their options relating to the incorporation of new and existing companies,” Will Dunham, executive vice president for government affairs at the AIC, wrote in a March letter to the Delaware General Assembly. Dunham urged the body to adopt the bill because it offers “greater predictability” for “deciding where to incorporate, what directors to select or how to execute a going-private transaction.”
Delaware has long been the preferred corporate home to big companies, including private equity firms, because of its generally business-friendly environment and its Chancery Court judges, business law experts who hear cases without a jury and usually much faster than other courts. More than 60% of Fortune 500 companies are incorporated in the state.
But it has proved vulnerable to critics like Musk, 53, who not only left but used his social media platform X to encourage others to follow him. Dropbox Inc. and TripAdvisor Inc. did just that, while fund manager Bill Ackman has said his management company will do the same.
After news that Meta Platforms Inc. was also considering decamping, Governor Matt Meyer invited company executives to a Sunday meeting, and the bill ultimately followed, according to records cited by CNBC. Meta, led by controlling shareholder Mark Zuckerberg, has been sued in Chancery Court by a pair of pension funds seeking internal documents to help determine whether its leadership is to blame for a $1.3 billion European Union fine over its privacy practices. The company declined to comment.
Meanwhile, Walmart Inc., the world’s largest retailer, has lobbied for the bill.
Even in deep blue Delaware, where both legislative chambers are controlled by Democrats, a bill favored by big business is on track for the Democratic governor’s signature — a measure of how important the distinction, and revenues, of the nation’s premier business court is to the state. Incorporation fees make up nearly a third of its annual budget.
Proponents say the bill doesn’t represent a radical overhaul but instead creates a road map for companies to follow for better governance. And they like to remind Delaware of all it has to lose.
Blake Rohrbacher, a lawyer at Richards, Layton & Finger, says he has held discussions with private equity firms about possible conversions to other states. His firm helps represent Tesla in the Musk pay case, which is on appeal, and was among various parties that offered suggestions to a panel that drafted the bill.
“The loss of one significant private equity company to another state represents far more than one corporation,” Rohrbacher said. “It would mean the loss of tens or hundreds of other corporations, as the entire structure would move and new corporations would not be formed here.”
The bill’s adversaries say they’re outgunned in the lobbying showdown.
“The proponents have far more resources,” said Joel Friedlander, a plaintiff’s lawyer at Wilmington-based Friedlander & Gorris. “But we are doing what we can to educate the public and the General Assembly about how Delaware’s governor and legal elite want to rebrand Delaware as a place where the judiciary cannot oversee self-dealing by billionaires.”
A spokesperson for the governor declined to comment on Friedlander’s remarks.
Copyright Bloomberg News
From outstanding individuals to innovative organizations, find out who made the final shortlist for top honors at the IN awards, now in its second year.
Cresset's Susie Cranston is expecting an economic recession, but says her $65 billion RIA sees "great opportunity" to keep investing in a down market.
“There’s a big pull to alternative investments right now because of volatility of the stock market,” Kevin Gannon, CEO of Robert A. Stanger & Co., said.
Sellers shift focus: It's not about succession anymore.
Platform being adopted by independent-minded advisors who see insurance as a core pillar of their business.
RIAs face rising regulatory pressure in 2025. Forward-looking firms are responding with embedded technology, not more paperwork.
As inheritances are set to reshape client portfolios and next-gen heirs demand digital-first experiences, firms are retooling their wealth tech stacks and succession models in real time.
