LPL's Kleintop: Markets 'may hit the ceiling'

LPL's Kleintop: Markets 'may hit the ceiling'
<i>The following is the weekly commentary of Jeffrey Kleintop, chief market strategist at LPL Financial, for the week of February 28, 2011. For more, <a href=http://lplfinancial.lpl.com/Documents/ResearchPublications/Weekly_Market_Commentary.pdf> click here.</a></i>
MAR 01, 2011
The following is the weekly commentary of Jeffrey Kleintop, chief market strategist at LPL Financial, for the week of February 28, 2011. For more, click here. Much attention has been focused on the federal debt approaching the $14.294 trillion debt ceiling and the showdown over spending in Congress as the ceiling is hit sometime in May. However, the markets have a more pressing fiscal concern. The government could face a shutdown this week if Congress does not agree to a continuing resolution to extend funding for this fiscal year on or by March 4. The desire by the Republicans to link the government funding and the debt ceiling votes have led to the increasing likelihood of a government shutdown. The potentially negative impact of a government shutdown is likely to add to the macroeconomic and geopolitical pressures on the markets this week. For a historical perspective on what the shutdown may mean for the markets, we have to look back 15 years to the last time a government shutdown occurred. At that time, the shutdown lasted three weeks from the failure of negotiations on December 15, 1995 through January 6, 1996. As the shutdown began, the S&P 500 started to slide, dropping nearly 2% over four days. However, the Federal Reserve cut interest rates on December 19, 1995 to promote economic growth, helping to halt the market's slide By the time the shutdown ended on January 6, 1996, the S&P 500 had recovered all of its losses. The Fed is unlikely to take any stimulative actions in the coming weeks beyond their planned bond purchase program whether there is a government shutdown or not. In addition, the debt is much larger and credit concerns remain foremost in the minds of investors after the financial crisis of 2008. This may leave the market more vulnerable than fifteen years ago. Another concern for investors may be over the earnings of those companies that do business with the government. During a shutdown, government agencies cannot enter into contracts with businesses and may be forced to delay payments. This may lead to temporary quarterly earnings misses for some companies with a high percentage of government business. During the last government shutdown, companies cautioned investors that quarterly earnings would be reduced as a result. The defense-oriented companies within the Industrials sector are potentially the most affected. The likelihood of a government shutdown is heightened by several factors. The outcome of the November 2010 elections was driven in no small part by concerns over runaway spending. The resulting split-party Congress has led to a bitter feud over proposed spending cuts. In addition, the Republicans appear to have a diversity of views and a large number of freshmen members of Congress that vote differently than the party leadership making negotiating a time-consuming process. While another temporary continuing resolution may fund the government and avoid a shutdown beginning this week, the debt ceiling issue lingers and is likely to garner increasing attention as Republicans seek spending cuts. The range of potential outcomes for the debt ceiling issue is wide. Of course, an extreme outcome could be default on U.S. government debt, as the Treasury Secretary has warned. This would be a disaster for the markets. Alternatively, one potential outcome that could be welcomed by the markets is the passage of a bill currently in the House with bi-partisan sponsorship (Corker-McCaskill CAP Act) that caps federal government spending at 20- 25% of GDP with no allowance for raising taxes and automatically forces cuts to discretionary and entitlement programs if Congress failed to meet the cap. This outcome could be good news for bonds and stocks and strengthen the dollar. However, the most likely outcome is that the impasse is resolved with modest cuts ($40 billion or so — a rounding error compared to trillions in annual federal spending). This most likely eventual outcome is probably neutral for the markets, but may not come until a market volatility-inducing showdown in Congress over funding takes place starting this week.

Latest News

RIA dealmaking accelerates as three firms hit AUM milestones
RIA dealmaking accelerates as three firms hit AUM milestones

Wealth Consulting Group, Coastline and Maridea report fresh capital, acquisitions and asset growth as advisor M&A keeps climbing

VastAdvisor closes $1 million SAFE round from advisor-side backers
VastAdvisor closes $1 million SAFE round from advisor-side backers

Carson Group's Dani Fava, Jason Pereira of Woodgate Financial, and Sally George of Convergency Partners led the raise as the growth-tech startup builds out its AI platform and leadership bench.

Wells Fargo adds three advisor practices as recruiting rebound continues
Wells Fargo adds three advisor practices as recruiting rebound continues

New teams from William Blair, Ameriprise and UBS bring more than $560 million in combined client assets to the firm's employee and independent channels.

UBS will pay advisors 'handsomely' for banking starting next year
UBS will pay advisors 'handsomely' for banking starting next year

Regulators this year approved UBS Bank USA’s conversion to a nationally chartered bank.

SEC accuses Tricolor executives of hiding $800 million collateral hole
SEC accuses Tricolor executives of hiding $800 million collateral hole

How a subprime lender’s car-loan bonds allegedly unraveled before bankruptcy.

SPONSORED Direct indexing webinar targets tax-loss harvesting amid market swings

Northern Trust’s Ken Lassner shows advisors how to convert volatility into after-tax portfolio gains

SPONSORED Who builds the income when the pension disappears?

Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income