SEC joins Finra in warning about use of leveraged and inverse ETFs

The Securities and Exchange Commission today got behind the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc.'s effort to alert investors about the potential pitfalls of leveraged, inverse and leveraged-inverse exchange traded funds.
AUG 18, 2009
The Securities and Exchange Commission today got behind the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc.’s effort to alert investors about the potential pitfalls of leveraged, inverse and leveraged-inverse exchange traded funds. “Not all ETFs are created equal,” John Gannon, Finra’s senior vice president for investor education, said in a statement. “Over time, leveraged and inverse ETFs can deviate substantially from the performance of the underlying benchmark, particularly in volatile periods,” he continued. “They are highly complex financial instruments that can turn into a minefield for buy-and-hold investors.” The two regulatory bodies outlined many of the potential hazards in an alert, “Leveraged and Inverse ETFs: Specialized Products with Extra Risks for Buy-and-Hold Investors.” The joint alert advises investors to consider leveraged and inverse ETFs only if they are confident the product can help meet their investment objectives, and only if they understand and are comfortable with the risks associated with these specialized ETFs. Because such ETFs are complex, the SEC and Finra also said investors should consider seeking the advice of an investment professional who understands the products and who is willing to monitor their performance. Though Finra has been trying to raise awareness about these complex products for weeks, the alert is the first such statement from the SEC warning investors about the risks involved. In June, Finra released a statement in which it told broker-dealers that inverse and leveraged ETFs “typically are unsuitable for retail investors” who hold them longer than a day. Finra clarified its position on such ETFs in a podcast July 13 in which it said member firms could recommend that a retail investor hold them for longer than one day, provided a suitability assessment is conducted with respect to such an investor and the ETF. But that hasn’t stopped a number of brokers from restricting the sale of leveraged and inverse ETFs or stopping their sale all together since Finra’s initial statement.

Latest News

Fed's Bowman pushes for lighter-touch AI oversight at smaller firms
Fed's Bowman pushes for lighter-touch AI oversight at smaller firms

Supervision vice chair speaks following recent launch of AI adoption practices by regulators.

Why fixed income still belongs in your clients' portfolios
Why fixed income still belongs in your clients' portfolios

In an era of AI euphoria and market FOMO, getting back to basics with fixed income may be the most contrarian and most important move advisors can make.

Voya expands advisor managed accounts to add private market assets
Voya expands advisor managed accounts to add private market assets

Voya Financial adds private equity, credit and real estate options to its AMA program, building on support for looser federal investment rules in retirement accounts.

With executives leaving, Osaic’s Reid now in the spotlight
With executives leaving, Osaic’s Reid now in the spotlight

Shannon Reid, president of Osaic and the network’s number two executive, has plenty of challenges, industry executives said.

Investors sue crypto fund and platform, alleging $1.5 million never returned
Investors sue crypto fund and platform, alleging $1.5 million never returned

Auditors flagged the commingling. The COO allegedly knew. Investors kept getting the pitch

SPONSORED Who builds the income when the pension disappears?

Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income

SPONSORED Why direct indexing stopped being optional

Direct indexing is on pace to outgrow ETFs and mutual funds. Northern Trust's Ken Lassner explains why the advisors who get it wish they had started sooner.