Finra arbitration panel awards Wilbanks Securities investor $1 million for misleading sales pitch on variable annuity

Finra arbitrators awarded an investor more than $1 million for what she alleges was a Wilbank Securities Inc.

Finra arbitrators awarded an investor more than $1 million for what she alleges was a Wilbank Securities Inc. broker’s misleading sales pitch about a variable annuity that over-promised and under-delivered.

Grace S. Huitt won a total of $1,073,440 — with $536,720 coming in compensatory damages and $536,720 in punitive damages — against Wilbanks in the case decided by a three-person all-public Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. arbitration panel. The award was signed Thursday.

Ms. Huitt alleged fraud, breach of contract, negligent supervision and breach of fiduciary duty related to her investment in an ING Landmark Variable Annuity, according to the award document.

She made the purchase at a Wilbanks Securities Grand Junction, Colo., branch in 2008 and sold the annuity in 2012. When she bought it, she was promised a guaranteed 7% compounded annual return, according to her lawyer, Marc Fitapelli, a partner at the law firm Fitapelli Kurta.

The difference between her promised return and what she received was reflected in the compensatory damages, Mr. Fitapelli said. He attributed the punitive damages, which were levied under Oklahoma law, to Wilbanks Securities’ “pattern of harming a group of people” beyond his client. He said that eight other investors documented similar problems.

Aaron B. Wilbanks, president and chief executive of Wilbanks Securities Inc., did not respond to a voice mail left at the firm’s Oklahoma City, Okla., headquarters. The firm has three disclosures on its BrokerCheck profile, two of which involved regulatory violations and one of which was Ms. Huitt’s arbitration proceeding.

The arbitration award says that Wilbanks Securities denied Ms. Huitt’s allegations and filed a counterclaim, alleging that Ms. Huitt was too late in pursuing arbitration. She filed her claim on Jan. 22, 2016. The Finra arbitrators denied the counterclaim and gave Ms. Huitt less than she originally sought, which were compensatory damages of $882,612.21 and punitive damages of $1,765,224.41.

Variable annuity sales totaled $102.1 billion in 2016, a 21.6% drop from their 2015 level of $130.4 billion, according to the Insured Retirement Institute.

Advocates for annuities — fixed, fixed index and variable — say that they are a critical component of retirement security because they provide a guaranteed income stream.

But Mr. Fitapelli said that his client’s case illustrates the downside of variable annuities, which have a reputation for being complex.

“Variable annuities are the worst thing in the world,” he said. “They’re confusing. The fees are too high, and they shouldn’t be sold. People don’t understand them.”

For reprint and licensing requests for this article, click here

Recent Articles by Author

Combatting senior abuse gets bipartisan backing

Combatting senior abuse gets bipartisan backing

The House Financial Services Committee approved by voice vote legislation to jump-start a state grant program. A backer is optimistic about its Senate prospects.

Vulnerable women represent opportunity for women advisers

Vulnerable women represent opportunity for women advisers

Women going through a difficult life transition, such as a divorce, often want to turn to other women for financial advice, said Stacy Francis, chief executive of Francis Financial.

SEC enforcement actions increase, but money to investors declines

SEC enforcement actions increase, but money to investors declines

The agency filed 434 new cases in fiscal 2021, while ordering $3.9 billion in penalties and disgorgement, down from $4.7 billion in fiscal 2020.

Kentucky, Mississippi latest states to adopt annuity best interest rule

Kentucky, Mississippi latest states to adopt annuity best interest rule

In a recent speech, SEC Commissioner Allison Herren Lee pointed out how the annuity rule differs from Reg BI on mitigating conflicts of interest.

Bill to end mandatory arbitration faces steep climb in Senate

Bill to end mandatory arbitration faces steep climb in Senate

Democrats back the legislation, but Republicans are united against it. While the measure was passed by a House committee, an advocate calls winning congressional approval a 'Herculean task.'

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print