Subscribe

Finra seeks comments on possible changes to oversight of complex products

Finra complex products

The regulator is assessing the risks that may arise when retail investors purchase complicated investments without the help of a financial adviser.

As investors gain more access to risky, complicated investments online, Finra is mulling whether it should change its rules pertaining to complex products.

Earlier this week, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. released a regulatory notice that included a request for public comment regarding oversight of leveraged and inverse exchange-traded products, options and other complex investments in an environment where investors can buy them on trading apps and over the internet.

The broker-dealer self-regulator is seeking public input on “whether the current regulatory framework, which was adopted at a time when the majority of individuals accessed financial products through financial professionals, rather than through self-directed platforms, is appropriately tailored to address current concerns raised by complex products and options,” the regulatory notice states.

Complex products are a regulatory priority for Finra this year. The regulatory notice says that the number of accounts “trading in complex products and options has increased significantly in recent years.”

The regulator has addressed risks associated with the vehicles through guidance on sales practices, investor alerts and rules for specific products and options. But it appears to be getting more intense about oversight.

“When you’re questioning your current regulatory framework, that seems to me to suggest you might have to update your rules,” said Bradley Berman, counsel at Mayer Brown. “They’re concerned about this new danger of retail investors buying options, and possibly structured products, all by themselves.”

There’s no formal definition for complex products, according to Finra. Generally, they’re investments that you can’t explain to your mother. They have complicated payout mechanisms, hidden risks and performance that doesn’t track the market. Some of them have built-in protections under securities laws and others don’t.

In the notice, Finra emphasized that under Regulation Best Interest, the broker standard adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, registered representatives must understand the features and risks of complex products before they recommend them to customers.

Finra also suggested it may look overseas for ideas on how to regulate complex products. For instance, it noted that European Union rules require financial firms to put in place “robust and objective procedures, methodologies and tools” to assess the risks of the investments and whether they fit an investor’s profile.

Following Europe’s example would be “a significantly different approach,” Berman said. “We have a regulatory light touch compared to what’s going on in the EU.”

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

FPA, CFP Board diverge on DOL investment advice proposal

While the CFP Board supports the proposal, the FPA has expressed concerns about the DOL rule potentially raising compliance costs for members, increasing the cost of advice and reducing access to advice for some.

Braxton encourages RIAs to see investing in diversity as a business strategy

‘If a firm values its human capital, then it will make an investment to make sure that their talent can flourish for the advancement of the bottom line,’ says Lazetta Rainey Braxton, co-CEO of 2050 Wealth Partners.

Bill chips away at SALT block but comes with drawbacks, advisors say

'I’d love to see the [full] SALT deduction come back but not if it means rates go up,' one advisor says.

Former Morgan Stanley broker running for office reviewing $147K award

Deborah Adeimy claimed firm blocked her from running in GOP primary, aide says 'we're unclear how award figure was calculated.'

GOP bill to kill SEC proposal on advisor AI conflicts faces obstacles

It’s more likely the GOP will make a point about their frustrations with the SEC than actually get the bill through the Democratic-controlled Senate.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print