Chinese acquisition of AssetMark raises questions

APR 17, 2016
The Chinese are coming! The Chinese are coming! They're coming to the U.S. investment advice market, as reported by Alessandra Malito. Huatai Securities Co., a Nanjing, China-based securities firm, has acquired AssetMark Inc., a Concord, Calif.,-based technology firm, for about $780 million. AssetMark provides analytical, portfolio and custodial services to financial advisers, brokers and investors, and its customers advise on $29 billion in assets. AssetMark offers a service called eWealthManager that advisers can use to research investments, develop portfolios, create and maintain client accounts, view current portfolio details, and access custodial resources. An affiliated company, AssetMark Trust, had approximately $16 billion under custody.

FOOTHOLD IN U.S.

Huatai provides financial services to individual, institutional and corporate clients in China, such as brokerage and wealth management, including stock, bond and futures trading. It also engages in investment banking and asset management. It is China's fourth-largest brokerage firm, and in 2015 it went public in a $4.5 billion initial public offering. Huatai likely wishes to establish a foothold in the U.S. wealth management market and also likely wants access to AssetMark's technology. It is unlikely to pose a threat to U.S. advisers for the foreseeable future even if it should want to compete with them eventually. Huatai also might want to serve as an access point for advisers wishing to invest client assets in China and other parts of Asia. These are legitimate business motives.

ACCESS POINT

But a few questions loom. First, does Huatai have any connection to the Chinese government and its security forces? Will the acquisition give Huatai access to the private information of U.S. investors that could be used for ill? Could its acquisition of AssetMark's technology provide a new access point for Chinese hackers into U.S. systems? We hope the responsible U.S. authorities have considered these questions and satisfied themselves that the answer to each of them is no.

Latest News

Barclays faces staff revolt over tightened return-to-office rules
Barclays faces staff revolt over tightened return-to-office rules

More than 1,000 employees have signed a union-backed letter opposing the bank's new three-day office mandate.

Amplify upgrades advisor platform with risk, trading and client access tools
Amplify upgrades advisor platform with risk, trading and client access tools

The release addresses account-level suitability gaps, consolidates trade management, and extends single sign-on to the Addepar client portal.

DC consultants shift from testing AI to putting it to work
DC consultants shift from testing AI to putting it to work

T. Rowe Price's sixth annual study reveals how retirement advisors are embracing AI, private credit, and personalized plan design.

House passes bipartisan bill offering fraud victims tax relief
House passes bipartisan bill offering fraud victims tax relief

House-passed measure would let fraud victims deduct losses and waive early-withdrawal penalties on stolen retirement funds.

Anthropic’s Enterprise plan urged for advisors in Claude roll-out
Anthropic’s Enterprise plan urged for advisors in Claude roll-out

Anthropic's Enterprise plan offers advisors stronger data controls — but smaller RIAs may struggle with the cost.

SPONSORED Direct indexing webinar targets tax-loss harvesting amid market swings

Northern Trust’s Ken Lassner shows advisors how to convert volatility into after-tax portfolio gains

SPONSORED Who builds the income when the pension disappears?

Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income