JPMorgan and Yodlee update data access pact as new fees loom for fintechs

JPMorgan Chase and Yodlee have amended their long-standing data access agreement, marking a new phase in the relationship between one of the country’s largest banks and a leading financial data aggregator.

The revised pact, announced Friday, introduces a formal pricing structure that could have far-reaching implications for fintech firms, crypto platforms, and the broader financial services ecosystem.

The agreement, which builds on a partnership spanning two decades, comes at a time when the flow of consumer financial data is under intense scrutiny from both regulators and industry players. This past summer, JPMorgan moved to charge data aggregators for access to customer account information – a shift that could reshape the economics of digital finance and spark new debates over who controls consumer data.

Melissa Feldsher, head of consumer payments at JPMorgan Chase, said the bank’s collaboration with Yodlee will “help improve financial wellness solutions for our customers and the overall open banking ecosystem.”

Farouk Ferchichi, chief executive at Yodlee – which was operating under Envestnet before its sale to private equity firm STG in September – added that the two companies are “building innovative financial wellness solutions for millions of US customers, informed by JPMorgan Chase’s deep expertise and the trillions of dollars in spending, income and wealth represented on the Yodlee platform.”

In July, the bank began notifying fintech companies and aggregators that it would start charging fees – potentially totaling hundreds of millions of dollars annually – for the data connections that underpin many popular apps and services. The fees, which vary depending on how the data is used, are expected to hit payments-focused companies hardest and could be passed down the chain from aggregators to fintechs and ultimately to consumers.

JPMorgan has defended the move as necessary to support the infrastructure that keeps customer data secure.

“We’ve had productive conversations and are working with the entire ecosystem to ensure we’re all making the necessary investments in the infrastructure that keeps our customers safe,” the bank said in July.

The timing of the agreement coincides with regulatory uncertainty surrounding the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s open banking rule, which would require banks to provide consumers with free access to their financial data. The rule, finalized last October, is now on hold as the CFPB reconsiders its approach following legal challenges from the banking industry. In the meantime, banks like JPMorgan are pressing ahead with their own frameworks for data access and pricing.

Industry reaction has been swift and, in some quarters, sharply critical. An article from Fortune shares how executives from fintech and crypto firms have sounded off, warning that the new fees could “cripple the crypto industry” and make it economically impossible for smaller startups to serve customers who bank with JPMorgan. One anonymous industry executive told the publication that the fees “would put everyone out of business…It would require everyone to raise prices by 1,000% to cover the cost.”

Some observers see the move as an attempt by large banks to assert control over the digital financial ecosystem. “JPMorgan’s plans to charge fintechs for customer data isn’t about a new revenue stream. It’s about strangling the competition,” said Alex Rampell, general partner at Andreessen Horowitz, in a social media post.

For now, the impact on mature fintechs such as PayPal and Block is expected to be limited, as these firms have already negotiated direct agreements with major banks. But for smaller RIAs, budgeting apps, and early-stage crypto platforms, the new costs could pose existential challenges.