A Northern California District Court judge dismissed a class-action lawsuit alleging that Charles Schwab’s Intelligent Portfolios violated its fiduciary duty by over-investing clients in cash.
The complaint, originally filed in September by plaintiffs Lauren Marie Barbiero, Kimberly Jo Lopez and William Kenneth Lopez, said “unwarranted and unfair cash sweeps” by the automated investing program cost investors as much as $500 million in market gains. The plaintiffs also alleged that Schwab misrepresented the robo-adviser as a free service while collecting management fees from clients investing in proprietary funds and earning interest on cash swept into Schwab’s bank.
In November, Schwab moved to have the case thrown out.
District Judge Phyllis Hamilton sided with Schwab. Because the class action’s claims are based on state law and allege that the defendants made misrepresentations in connection with the sale or purchase of a covered security, the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act prevents the federal court from hearing them, the judge decided.
The statute was designed to prevent artful pleading or forum shopping by those injured in a securities transaction and looking to evade limits on securities litigations designed to block frivolous or abusive suits, Hamilton noted. The court had to determine if the claims could have been pursued under the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules.
“Reading the complaint in a light most favorable to plaintiffs, the court finds that SLUSA bars plaintiffs’ complaint in its entirety,” Hamilton wrote in her decision.
Calling the lawsuit a “meritless complaint,” Peter Greenley, Charles Schwab's director of corporate external relations, said the company is pleased with the court’s dismissal. Intelligent Portfolios is “a key component of our advisory lineup and an important way to help clients invest for the future in a diversified way," Greenley said in a statement.
The plaintiffs were represented by attorneys from Scott + Scott Attorneys at Law and Peiffer Wolf Carr Kane & Conway. Neither firm immediately responded to requests for comment.
Schwab’s robo-adviser is still facing regulatory scrutiny. The brokerage announced in July that the SEC was probing Intelligent Portfolios regarding disclosure issues. While it didn't detail the SEC’s investigation, the company revealed that it had set aside $200 million to settle potential charges.
Salespeople at the firm often went beyond the matching algorithm to recommend network advisors on its Zoe Wealth platform, according to the regulator.
The Protect College Sports Act would cap school payments and codify NIL rights, with implications for advisors guiding young athletes.
"I know the number that I want to be able to retire on, and now I just want out," says Wilmington Trust's Marguerite Weese, describing a common refrain among business-owner clients.
Bessemer and Brown Brothers Harriman veteran Robert Ludricks III and private markets specialist Olof Akesson join the ultra-high-net-worth push on the East Coast.
765 investors were promised 260% annual returns on truck leases
As AI makes financial information more accessible than ever, Lana Hock explains why human judgment, trust, and empathy remain the qualities clients value most in a financial advisor
Northern Trust’s Ken Lassner shows advisors how to convert volatility into after-tax portfolio gains
