The war of words among robos

It's time to call a truce in the war of words among robo-rivals and get back to business.
MAR 25, 2015
As much as we love a verbal brawl — especially one that pits robo-Davids against a robo-Goliath — it's time to call a truce in the war of words among robo-rivals and get back to business. Wealthfront chief executive Adam Nash unleashed the first volley a couple of weeks ago, when he accused industry giant Charles Schwab & Co. of purposely misleading investors by promoting its new robo-adviser service, Schwab Intelligent Portfolios, as “free.” Mr. Nash opined that investors actually will pay thousands of dollars in opportunity costs related to high cash allocations and expensive smart beta exchange-traded funds, many of which are proprietary or “from issuers that pay Schwab to use them.” In an unsigned retort, Schwab defended its decision to include cash as one of the asset classes selected by its robo-adviser. It then accused Wealthfront of overcharging investors by taking a 0.25% management fee, calling such fees “sunk costs for investors.”

SNARK ALL AROUND

“Adam wishes he could build a moat around Wealthfront and protect it against competition,” Schwab wrote in its post. Of course, it did not end there. Also jumping into the battle with a little snark of his own was Betterment CEO Jon Stein, who went on CNBC and made the dubious declaration that Schwab was “too late” to the robo-market. In the end, the game of tit for tat being played by Schwab and its robo-competitors — though interesting — is little more than a distraction in the evolution of automated advice platforms. For better or worse (and this publication believes largely for better), robo-advice is here to stay. After all, automated investment guidance provides a much-needed service to mom-and-pop savers and millennials. Flesh-and-blood financial advisers would be better off focusing on how to continue expanding their range of services in order to justify their own 1% to 1.25% fees, rather than getting caught up in the hype and hoopla among robos desperately trying to make sure they don't get put out of business by the likes of Schwab.

Latest News

Women feel confident about saving, but many still keep cash in low-yield accounts
Women feel confident about saving, but many still keep cash in low-yield accounts

A new survey finds that many women prioritize financial security but continue to leave savings in accounts that may not keep pace with inflation.

SEC seeks comment on prediction-market ETFs after May pause
SEC seeks comment on prediction-market ETFs after May pause

Roundhill, Bitwise and GraniteShares funds remain on hold while the agency weighs how novel ETFs should be regulated.

Dump investment banks, buy alternative asset managers, says Oppenheimer
Dump investment banks, buy alternative asset managers, says Oppenheimer

"Shares of alternative assets managers have lagged this year as investors grow wary of private-credit exposure."

TaxStatus rolls out rules-based tool to flag advice gaps
TaxStatus rolls out rules-based tool to flag advice gaps

The fintech platform is touting a new AI-free Planning Observations feature, which draws on IRS tax records to uncover opportunities for advisors.

Carson Group deepens Colorado presence with Arvada advisor deal
Carson Group deepens Colorado presence with Arvada advisor deal

The Omaha, Nebraska-based RIA's latest acquisition expands its Rocky Mountain footprint after two prior Colorado deals last year.

SPONSORED Who builds the income when the pension disappears?

Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income

SPONSORED Why direct indexing stopped being optional

Direct indexing is on pace to outgrow ETFs and mutual funds. Northern Trust's Ken Lassner explains why the advisors who get it wish they had started sooner.