Subscribe

Opinion: Who needs empirical evidence when you have dead Austrian economists on your side?

Hayek, Mises big among some conservatives; a priori principals trump data

Richard Posner gave an interview to NPR this week in which he blasts current-day conservatives and says today’s “goofy” Republican Party has made him less conservative. Over the last 10 years, he said, “There’s been a real deterioration in conservative thinking. And that has to lead people to re-examine and modify their thinking.”
Posner is probably the most respected judge in America who doesn’t sit on the Supreme Court, and a key thinker in the law and economics movement. His alienation is a reflection of how hostile the conservative movement has become to intellectuals.
Of course, conservatives will tell you they care a lot about intellectual grounding. These days, they especially love Austrian economists, such as Friedrich Hayek and Ludwig von Mises. I have a whole bookshelf dedicated to duplicate copies of Austrian economics books that conservative and libertarian organizations have given to me for free. I have four copies of The Road to Serfdom, which is like Dianetics for libertarians.
There are two big reasons today’s right loves the Austrians. One is that Austrian economists reject empirical analysis, and instead believe that you can reach conclusions about correct economic policies from a priori principles, a discipline called ‘praxeology.’ It’s philosophy dressed up as economics; with the Austrians, there is never any risk that real-world events will interfere with your ideology.
The other big advantage is that the main Austrian thinkers, Friedrich Hayek and Ludwig von Mises, are dead, so they can’t argue with your interpretation of their work. This is especially important with Hayek, who got sort of squishy later in life.
And that is how so many on the right have pulled off the remarkable feat of going through the 2008 crisis and its aftermath without revisiting any of their policy views. Mine have certainly changed a lot — I have a much different outlook on monetary policy and bank regulation than I did four years ago. Posner had a big shift on fiscal policy.
But if you have Mises at your side, you “know” that empirical findings have no bearing on what policy should be. Leaning on Austrian thinkers is a great way to avoid further thinking. If Posner feels like he’s no longer welcome on the right, it’s probably because the right has decided it no longer needs people like Posner.
–Bloomberg News–

(Josh Barro is lead writer for the Ticker. The opinions expressed are his own)

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Barro: In flap over ‘Makers and Takers,’ Ryan a faker

Rep.'s attacks on Obama's 'twist of terms' feature some twists of his own

Platinum coin gets gold medal compared to alternatives

Prioritization? Taking the debt ceiling to court? These suggestions could do serious harm

Why platinum-coin critics are flat-out wrong

Pundits express shock over deficit-ceiling work around; numismatists on the fence

Barro: Attacks on broadening the tax base baseless

Close to $1T could be raised by limiting deductions; hey, it's a start

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print