Bank of America and its subsidiary, Merrill Lynch, have reached a settlement with Finra, including a $3 million fine and censure, for a reported years-long failure to adequately supervise potentially manipulative trading by their customers.
The settlement, dated August 28, stems from violations that occurred over several years, beginning in 2015 for Merrill Lynch and 2019 for Bank of America Securities, the firm’s institutional broker-dealer, according to Finra.
The AWC noted that both entities relied on third-party surveillance systems to detect manipulative practices, such as wash trading and prearranged trading. These activities, where investors buy and sell the same securities to create the impression of market activity involving the same securities, were not properly flagged due to the "too narrow" parameters set within the surveillance systems.
“[T]he firm did not take reasonable steps … to determine whether these parameters were reasonable or additional surveillances were necessary,” Finra said. “The firm could not explain why it initially selected the particular modules that it used or why it did not select other modules that were available from the vendor.”
The ACW letter also highlighted how at certain periods, Merrill excluded trading in OTC securities and warrants from its surveillance systems. While its surveillance system had the capability to surveil for wash trading in warrants as early as 2016, a coding error let those trades fall through the cracks until January 2019.
“Between July 2017 and October 2018, Merrill failed to have a surveillance system in place to detect wash trading, prearranged trades, matched trades, or spoofing and layering in OTC securities because [it] had failed to purchase the OTC data feed from its third-party vendor,” Finra said.
Because of their “deficient” systems, the firms failed to review 155 alerts linked to approximately 700 potentially manipulative equity trades, as well as roughly 1,000 alerts that represented around 125,000 potentially manipulative options trades, by Finra’s count.
The failure to detect these trades went unnoticed until August 2020, when Merrill Lynch responded to a regulatory inquiry. Finra noted that there were numerous red flags, including internal testing results, that should have raised alarms at the firms.
The violations were found to be in breach of Finra’s Rule 3011, which mandates reasonably designed supervisory systems, and Rule 2010, which requires firms to uphold "high standards of commercial honor."
Merrill Lynch and Bank of America accepted the settlement – with $699,000 of the fine to be paid to Finra and the rest to exchanges including the NYSE and Nasdaq – without admitting or denying the findings.
"We have been enhancing our surveillance program and will continue to implement improvements to ensure we meet regulatory requirements," Merrill said in a statement, noting there was no client harm found related to the findings by Finra.
Despite relying heavily on Social Security for retirement income, many older Americans doubt the program will deliver full benefits in the future.
BlackRock data shows workers without a financial cushion are far more likely to raid their 401(k) — and less likely to ever start contributing.
With just a small fraction of eligible kids enrolled ahead of the July 4 launch, experts warn lower-income families could be falling behind.
When even perfect portfolios come under pressure from fear or greed, a disciplined and balanced framework can make for better investing decisions.
The latest father-son additions at Merill include a tandem originally with Wells Fargo and an Iowa-based trio that crossed over from Baird.
Dan Biagini of American Equity says the steady decline of pensions, longer lifespans and a reset in interest rates are rewriting how advisors build retirement income
Direct indexing is on pace to outgrow ETFs and mutual funds. Northern Trust's Ken Lassner explains why the advisors who get it wish they had started sooner.
