Former S&P exec: Revenue pressure skewed ratings

Former S&P exec: Revenue pressure skewed ratings
Tells Congressional panel that the push to land bank fees -- along with lax government oversight and breakdown in communications -- resulted in abuses
APR 15, 2010
Former credit rating industry executives told a Senate panel Friday that competitive pressures and poor internal communications led their analysts to award safe ratings to risky investments. The highly rated investments turned out to be toxic, contributing to the financial crisis. The chairman of a panel investigating the industry proposed Friday that Congress should address a conflict of interest that arises from credit rating agencies being paid by the same banks whose bonds they rate. "It's like one of the parties in court paying the judge's salary," said Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich. He said the financial regulatory overhaul the Senate will take up Monday should include a solution to that problem. Levin was chairing a hearing of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, which has been investigating the causes of the financial crisis. He said credit rating agencies gave high ratings to risky investments before the financial crisis in part because they were competing for business from the banks. Frank Raiter, a former managing director for Standard & Poor, said there was a "disconnect" between senior managers and the analytical managers responsible for assigning bond ratings. He said that, along with weak government regulation, led agencies to award high ratings to risky investments. Raiter said management placed increasing pressure on analysts to earn fees by attracting business from banks. He said many former colleagues had quit after clashing with management. When analysts "show the benefits of higher-quality rating criteria, and they come back and say, 'Revenues will go down,' you either (drop the issue and) continue to work there, or you quit," said former Standard & Poor managing director Frank Raiter. Raiter also said weak government regulation led agencies to award high ratings to risky investments. The Securities and Exchange Commission is prohibited by law from overseeing credit rating agencies. The agencies have escaped legal liability by claiming their ratings are protected by the First Amendment right to free speech.

Latest News

SEC Says Game Service Roblox Part of ‘Active Investigation’
SEC Says Game Service Roblox Part of ‘Active Investigation’

Short sellers previously said the company was under investigation, though Roblox denied allegations.

Musk’s DOGE descends on CFPB with intention to shut it down
Musk’s DOGE descends on CFPB with intention to shut it down

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is in the crosshairs of the Republican group that is widely attempting to dismantle government agencies.

Advisor fighting Finra banishment loses $17.7 million dispute with old firm
Advisor fighting Finra banishment loses $17.7 million dispute with old firm

National Securities Corp. sued the advisor in 2020, alleging breach of contract and unjust enrichment.

Job numbers, inflation leaving room for Fed to hold rates
Job numbers, inflation leaving room for Fed to hold rates

Recent data support a measured pace by the Federal Reserve for the year ahead.

Private assets remain hot despite surging stock market
Private assets remain hot despite surging stock market

Financial advisors are still adding alternatives despite the surge in publicly traded stock prices

SPONSORED Taylor Matthews on what's behind Farther's rapid growth

From 'no clients' to reshaping wealth management, Farther blends tech and trust to deliver family-office experience at scale.

SPONSORED Why wealth advisors should care about the future of federal tax policy

Blue Vault features expert strategies to harness for maximum client advantage.