Subscribe

Housing biggest expense for 50-plus set

The majority of spending for Americans over 50 goes to mortgages, property taxes and other home-related expenses, according…

The majority of spending for Americans over 50 goes to mortgages, property taxes and other home-related expenses, according to data released last week by the Employee Benefit Research Institute.

In 2009, Americans 50 to 64 spent a median of $18,828, or 47% of their total expenses, on mortgages or rent, as well as insurance, property taxes and repairs, EBRI found. Meanwhile, those over 85 spent a median of $9,533, which accounted for 43% of their total spending.

The research group, which analyzed data from 5,000 U.S. households between 2000 and 2009, found that Americans progressively spend less money as they age. Although expenses generally dropped off as the respondents in the survey aged, health care seemed to be the one area where people paid more as they aged.

For instance, in 2009, people 50 to 64 spent a median of $2,844, or 9% of total expenses, on their health. That number went as high as $3,692 for people 75 to 84, accounting for 15% of their expenditures, and then dropped slightly to $3,000 for the 85-and-over crowd, making up 18% of their total costs.

Author Sudipto Banerjee, a research associate with EBRI, surmised that even as older people eventually pay off their mortgages, they still pay a good deal of cash on maintenance costs, utilities and property taxes, which never seem to go away.

“The dollar amount spent on homes goes down pretty fast, but in percentage terms, the amounts are still large,” he said. “Property taxes are almost a constant factor.”

Mr. Banerjee also concluded that expenditures for a retired household are about 80% of what they are for a working household.

Meanwhile, a retired household’s income is equal to 57% of that of a working household.

Although the disparity in expenditures and income may be large, Mr. Banerjee said that workers still spend a lot of their money on FICA taxes and retirement plan contributions at the workplace.

At retirement, these expenditures change or are eliminated.

Thus, provided that retirees have saved enough by the time they stop working, they can still live on a lower percentage of pre-retirement income, Mr. Banerjee said.

[email protected]

Related Topics:

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

As indexed universal life sales climb, be sure to mind the risks

Advisers need to bear in mind that this cousin of traditional universal life insurance requires unique precautions.

Donald Sterling’s battle holds harsh lessons for advisers

The L.A. Clippers owner's fight with pro basketball highlights important tax and estate strategies that may surprise you.

Advisers fall short on implementation of long-term-care insurance

Most know it's a key part of retirement planning but lack in-depth knowledge when the need for care arises.

Broker-dealers face administrative hurdles in rollout of QLAC annuity

Confusion remains over who ensures the contract purchase meets Treasury's guidelines.

Finra arbitration panel awards $500,000 to former Morgan Stanley rep

Broker and wirehouse embroiled in a three-year dispute over a promissory note.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print